The Xiaomi Poco F4 and vivo T1 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F4 leverages the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 870, while the vivo T1 opts for the more recent, efficiency-focused Snapdragon 778G. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, display quality, and charging capabilities to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and demanding gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870. However, the vivo T1 offers a balanced package with respectable performance and notably faster 66W charging, making it ideal for everyday users who value efficiency and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | - | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 870
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging with PD3.0 support
- Potentially lower battery efficiency due to 7nm process
- May run warmer under sustained load
Xiaomi Poco F4
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Fast 66W charging
- Potentially better battery life due to 6nm process
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 870
- Display likely less bright than Poco F4
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1003 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo T1. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays have an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the Poco F4’s superior brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (AMOLED vs IPS) and refresh rate are missing for the vivo T1, but the Poco F4’s brightness alone gives it a clear edge for visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size information or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of specific camera specs suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse. The Poco F4’s image processing is likely tuned for vibrant colors, typical of Xiaomi, while the vivo T1 may lean towards a more natural look. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm) versus the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm). The Snapdragon 870 features a faster prime core (3.2 GHz Kryo 585) compared to the T1’s (2.4 GHz Cortex-A78), and higher clock speeds across its performance cores (2.42 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Poco F4 in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process of the 870 is less efficient than the 6nm process of the 778G, potentially leading to higher temperatures under sustained load. However, the 870’s architectural advantages generally outweigh this efficiency difference in terms of raw speed. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but specific speeds are not provided.
Battery Life
Both the Poco F4 and vivo T1 share an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified for the vivo T1). However, the charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Poco F4 supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving a full charge in 38 minutes. The vivo T1 offers 66W wired charging, which is also very fast, but slightly slower. The Poco F4’s support for PD3.0 offers broader compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G) if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging and prioritize battery efficiency over absolute peak performance. It’s a great choice for media consumption and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding games and applications, and are willing to accept potentially slightly lower battery life in exchange for that extra horsepower.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While the Poco F4 likely incorporates thermal management solutions, users may experience some throttling during extended gaming. However, the 870’s performance headroom generally outweighs this concern for most gamers.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the vivo T1 enough to quickly top up the battery throughout the day?
Yes, 66W charging is exceptionally fast and can significantly reduce downtime. While slightly slower than the Poco F4’s 67W charging, it’s still capable of fully charging the phone in under an hour, providing convenient top-ups throughout the day.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the vivo T1 handle demanding apps and multitasking effectively?
The Snapdragon 778G is a capable mid-range chipset that handles everyday tasks, social media, and most apps with ease. Multitasking is generally smooth, although it may not match the Poco F4’s performance when running multiple resource-intensive applications simultaneously.
