vivo T1 vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 12 Lite edges out the vivo T1 thanks to its brighter display, faster charging, and slightly more refined design. However, the vivo T1 often presents a more competitive price, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers seeking solid performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G) | Xiaomi 12 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, July 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Models | - | 2203129G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Excellent value for money
- Solid Snapdragon 778G performance
- Fast 66W charging
- Decent AMOLED display
- Display brightness not as high as Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Design might be less premium
- Camera processing could be improved
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Stylish and premium design
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 support
- Potentially better camera processing
- Slightly higher price
- MIUI can be bloated for some users
- Battery life, while good, might not be significantly better than vivo T1
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a significant advantage with its measured 824 nits peak brightness, making it much easier to view in direct sunlight. While both phones feature AMOLED displays, the Xiaomi 12 Lite's higher brightness contributes to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The vivo T1's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is nuanced. While both offer capable photo and video capabilities, the Xiaomi 12 Lite often delivers slightly more refined image processing and potentially better low-light performance due to software enhancements. The vivo T1 might offer a different color science, which some users may prefer. Detailed camera tests are needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Both devices share the same Snapdragon 778G chipset, ensuring comparable performance in everyday tasks and gaming. You can expect smooth multitasking and responsive app loading on both phones. However, software optimization can play a role, and Xiaomi's MIUI might offer slightly more features and customization options.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12 Lite advertises an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the vivo T1's battery capacity is likely similar, Xiaomi's optimization and potentially more efficient display contribute to its longer endurance. Both phones support fast charging, with the Xiaomi 12 Lite offering slightly faster speeds (67W vs 66W).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)? Users prioritizing value and a slightly more aggressive price point will find the vivo T1 appealing. Who should buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite? Those seeking a more stylish design, a brighter display for outdoor use, and slightly faster charging will prefer the Xiaomi 12 Lite.