The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE both aim for the sweet spot of performance and affordability. Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, creating a seemingly even playing field. However, key differences in charging speed and potentially software implementation separate these two contenders, making the choice less straightforward than it appears.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer sustained performance, the vivo T1 emerges as the winner. Its 66W wired charging significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s 33W, reducing downtime. While both share the same chipset and battery endurance rating, the charging advantage tips the scales.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 158 g (5.57 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Global), 5.1 (India) |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 (Global), Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (India) |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Truffle Black (Vinyl Black), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Snowflake White (Diamond Dazzle) |
| Models | - | 2109119DG, 2107119DC, 2109119DI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 122h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 527663 (v9)
GeekBench: 2832 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Potentially better thermal management (newer device)
- Snapdragon 778G offers excellent performance
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Software experience may be less refined than Xiaomi's MIUI
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
- Established MIUI software experience
- Potentially more color-accurate display
- Good overall battery endurance
- Slower 33W charging
- May experience more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both the vivo T1 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type (AMOLED vs. LCD) are missing. Given the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s historical focus on slim design, it’s likely to prioritize color accuracy and viewing angles, while the vivo T1 might lean towards maximizing brightness for outdoor visibility. Without further data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Xiaomi’s brand reputation suggests a potentially more color-accurate display.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE has a history of offering competitive camera performance in its price bracket, potentially leveraging Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms. The vivo T1’s camera performance is less well-established. Without concrete sensor specifications, it’s impossible to definitively say which phone will capture better images. We can assume both will include a standard set of lenses (main, ultrawide, macro), but the quality will hinge on the primary sensor and software processing.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration: 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world difference will likely come down to thermal management and software optimization. The vivo T1, being a newer device, *may* benefit from more refined power management profiles. RAM configuration is not specified, but LPDDR5 is expected in both, ensuring smooth multitasking. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G provides a good balance between performance and efficiency, but sustained performance will depend on how effectively each phone dissipates heat.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the vivo T1 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE share an endurance rating of 122 hours. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The vivo T1’s 66W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s 33W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time for the vivo T1, minimizing downtime. While both may offer similar overall battery life, the vivo T1’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups throughout the day, making it more convenient for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G) if you need rapid charging and anticipate heavy daily usage, benefiting from quicker top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (based on Xiaomi’s established MIUI) and are less concerned with minimizing charging times. Both are excellent choices for media consumption and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the vivo T1 compared to the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
The vivo T1’s 66W charging will likely take around 40-50 minutes for a full charge, while the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s 33W charging will likely take around 60-75 minutes. This is a substantial difference, especially for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Will I notice a difference in gaming performance between the vivo T1 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE?
Given both phones use the same Snapdragon 778G chipset, raw gaming performance will be very similar. However, the vivo T1 *may* maintain higher frame rates for longer periods due to potentially better thermal management, preventing performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE have a microSD card slot for expandable storage?
The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE does *not* include a microSD card slot. Users are limited to the internal storage option they choose at purchase. The vivo T1's microSD card support is currently unknown.
