Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The vivo T1 and iQOO Z7x are both compelling mid-range options, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the perfect fit for your budget and lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Z7x takes the lead with its significantly faster 80W charging and generally more efficient power management. However, the vivo T1 boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset, offering a noticeable performance edge for gaming and demanding tasks. It's a close call, but charging speed and efficiency give the Z7x a slight advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, March 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 164.6 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 80W wired, 70% in 34 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Tropical Blue, Metallic Grey, Orange |
| Models | - | V2272A |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 180 EUR |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Potentially better camera quality
- Sleek design
- Slower charging speed (66W)
- May have slightly less efficient battery management
vivo iQOO Z7x
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Excellent battery life
- Competitive price
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Design may be less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch display, likely LCD panels with a 120Hz refresh rate. While resolution is likely FHD+ for both, the T1 might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its higher-tier chipset. Expect similar viewing experiences overall, with smooth scrolling and decent brightness.
Camera Comparison
The vivo T1 likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities thanks to the more powerful chipset. The iQOO Z7x likely focuses on consistent, reliable shots, but may lack the dynamic range and detail of the T1. Both likely feature a 16MP front-facing camera.
Performance
This is where the vivo T1 shines. The Snapdragon 778G is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 695. Expect smoother app launches, faster loading times, and better performance in graphically intensive games. The iQOO Z7x will handle everyday tasks well, but will struggle more with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The iQOO Z7x is the clear winner here. Its 80W charging is incredibly fast, allowing for a full charge in under an hour. The vivo T1's 66W charging is still respectable, but noticeably slower. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), but the Z7x's charging advantage makes a significant difference in daily usage.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and smoother multitasking, especially gamers. The iQOO Z7x is a better choice for those who value rapid charging and extended battery life, and are less concerned with raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo T1 is the better choice for gaming due to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The iQOO Z7x charges much faster, taking around 34 minutes with its 80W charger, while the vivo T1 takes longer with its 66W charger.