The vivo iQOO Neo 6 and vivo T1 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The iQOO Neo 6, equipped with the Snapdragon 870, aims for near-flagship performance, while the vivo T1 leverages the efficient Snapdragon 778G to balance power and affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the vivo iQOO Neo 6 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 delivers a noticeable uplift in gaming and demanding tasks. However, the vivo T1 remains a compelling option for those seeking a balanced experience at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | - | I2126 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Good overall battery endurance
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 870
- Slower charging speeds (66W)
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset for gaming and multitasking
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Battery life is similar to the T1 despite the more powerful chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo iQOO Neo 6 boasts a measured peak brightness of 772 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the vivo T1 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio on the iQOO Neo 6, the iQOO's higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The absence of refresh rate information for the T1 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the iQOO Neo 6's display is likely to offer a smoother visual experience if it supports a higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the iQOO Neo 6, positioned as a more performance-focused device, likely benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 870, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The absence of details on the T1’s camera system suggests a more basic implementation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm) significantly outperforms the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) in CPU and GPU benchmarks. The 870 features a 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core versus the T1’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, resulting in faster processing speeds. While the 6nm process of the 778G offers efficiency, the 870’s architectural advantages and higher clock speeds translate to a more responsive experience, particularly in graphically intensive games. The iQOO Neo 6 is better equipped for sustained performance due to the more powerful chipset.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 97 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the iQOO Neo 6’s 80W wired charging (50% in 12 minutes, 100% in 32 minutes) is a significant advantage over the vivo T1’s 66W charging. This faster charging speed minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G) if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't require the absolute highest performance for gaming. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6 if you prioritize smooth gaming, faster app loading times, and the convenience of 80W fast charging, even if it means potentially spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo 6 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 870 is well-equipped to handle Genshin Impact and other demanding games at high settings. Its powerful GPU and efficient thermal design allow for sustained performance without significant throttling, providing a smooth gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the iQOO Neo 6 compared to the 66W charging on the vivo T1 in real-world use?
The iQOO Neo 6 can reach 50% charge in just 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes. While the T1's 66W charging is still fast, it will take noticeably longer to fully charge the battery, potentially adding 10-15 minutes to the full charge time.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 870 and 778G noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference will be minimal. Both chipsets are capable of handling these tasks smoothly. However, you'll notice a difference when multitasking, opening multiple apps, or performing more demanding operations like video editing.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 6 have any cooling features to prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions?
While specific cooling features aren't detailed in the provided data, iQOO phones often incorporate vapor chamber cooling systems to manage thermal performance. The Snapdragon 870, while powerful, is also relatively efficient, reducing the likelihood of excessive heat buildup.
