vivo T1 vs Realme GT Master: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme GT Master edges out the vivo T1 thanks to its slightly faster charging, potentially better display brightness, and a more distinctive design. However, the vivo T1 might offer better value depending on pricing and regional availability. Both are solid choices powered by the Snapdragon 778G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G) | Realme GT Master |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, July 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, July 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 159.2 mm x 73.5 mm x 8.0/8.7 mm (depending on color) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180.3 g (6.35 oz) | 174/180 g (depending on color) (6.14 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Turbo Black, Turbo Cyan | Black, Gray, White, Aurora |
| Models | - | RMX3363, RMX3360, RMX3361 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 142.99 / € 128.55 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529263 (v9) GeekBench: 2917 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 778G)
- Potentially more affordable
- 66W fast charging
- Reliable Snapdragon 778G performance
- Good overall value
- Display brightness potentially lower than GT Master
- Design might be less distinctive
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Realme GT Master
- Slightly faster charging (65W)
- Potentially brighter display (634 nits)
- Distinctive design
- Excellent battery life (114h endurance rating)
- Potentially more expensive
- Software experience (Realme UI) may not appeal to everyone
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Realme GT Master boasts a measured peak brightness of 634 nits, suggesting it might be slightly better suited for outdoor visibility. The vivo T1's display is likely very good, but specific brightness measurements are harder to find. Contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' for the GT Master, which is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require extensive testing. The Realme GT Master's camera is generally well-regarded for its color science and dynamic range. The vivo T1's camera is likely competitive, but specific strengths and weaknesses need further evaluation.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 778G, both phones deliver smooth and responsive performance for everyday tasks and even moderate gaming. The CPU and chipset are identical, so expect similar performance in most scenarios. Software optimization might be the differentiating factor here, with Realme UI and Funtouch OS offering different user experiences.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Master boasts an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The vivo T1's battery life is likely very good as well, but the GT Master has a clear advantage in this area. The GT Master also offers 65W wired charging, completing a full charge in 33 minutes, while the vivo T1 has 66W charging, potentially offering slightly faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is ideal for users prioritizing a balanced experience with a focus on reliable performance and potentially a more affordable price point. The Realme GT Master is a good fit for those who value design, slightly faster charging, and a potentially brighter display, willing to spend a bit more.