The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India variant) represent compelling options. While both aim for affordability, they diverge in chipset choice – the Snapdragon 680 versus the Snapdragon 695 – and charging speeds. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the vivo T1 remains a viable option for those seeking a slightly more power-efficient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 04 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Starry Sky, Ice Dawn | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2153 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680)
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the Snapdragon 680's core configuration.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Slower charging speeds compared to the Redmi.
- Inferior CPU and GPU performance for demanding applications.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster Snapdragon 695 processor for improved performance.
- 67W fast charging for significantly reduced downtime.
- Integrated 5G modem for future-proof connectivity.
- Potentially slightly lower battery life due to the more powerful processor.
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo T1.
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's positioning, it likely features a higher resolution AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering superior color vibrancy and smoothness compared to the vivo T1, which likely utilizes an LCD panel. The Redmi's potential for higher peak brightness would also improve outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Redmi's display tech is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, being a 'Pro' model, likely features a larger main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a crucial advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing and noise reduction. The vivo T1 likely relies on software algorithms to compensate, but will likely fall short in challenging conditions. We can assume both will include standard ultrawide and macro lenses, but the main sensor quality is the deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, boasts a more modern CPU architecture (Kryo 660) with 2x2.2 GHz performance cores and 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores, compared to the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 680 (also 6nm) with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. This translates to a roughly 15-20% performance advantage for the Redmi in CPU-intensive tasks. The 695 also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the 4G-only T1. While both likely pair with similar RAM configurations, the 695’s GPU will provide a more fluid gaming experience.
Battery Life
Both phones utilize a 6nm chipset, suggesting good power efficiency. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Advertised 0-50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes significantly reduces charging downtime compared to the vivo T1’s 44W charging (50% in 28 minutes). While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680) if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a smooth, reliable experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and benefit from significantly faster charging speeds, especially if you're a heavy phone user.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 680, especially with optimized in-game settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo T1 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can realistically shave off around 20-30 minutes from a full charge compared to the vivo T1's 44W charging. This is a substantial difference for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the vivo T1 a significant drawback in 2024?
The significance of lacking 5G depends on your location and carrier. If 5G coverage is limited in your area, the absence of 5G on the vivo T1 won't be a major issue. However, if you anticipate using 5G in the near future, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers future-proof connectivity.
