The vivo T1 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, but target slightly different priorities. The T1 focuses on efficient 4G connectivity, while the X4 Pro 5G adds 5G capability and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers 5G connectivity and a performance edge, complemented by 67W charging. However, the vivo T1 remains a strong contender for those content with 4G and seeking a slightly more streamlined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 04 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Starry Sky, Ice Dawn | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2153 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680)
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for everyday tasks
- Clean and streamlined software experience (likely)
- Competitive 44W fast charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower performance in demanding applications
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- Potentially more bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
- May experience more thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price points, we can assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The absence of LTPO technology means neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment. Without further data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner; display quality will likely depend on panel-to-panel variation.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor details are lacking. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, the quality of the image processing algorithms will be a significant differentiator. We can expect the Poco X4 Pro 5G, given Xiaomi’s camera focus, to potentially offer more sophisticated image processing features. The inclusion of OIS on the primary sensor (likely absent on both, given the price point) would be a significant advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and 5G capabilities compared to the vivo T1’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The 695 features a 2x2 Kryo 660 Gold core configuration at 2.2 GHz, paired with 6x Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. This contrasts with the T1’s 4x Kryo 265 Gold cores at 2.4 GHz and 4x Kryo 265 Silver cores at 1.9 GHz. While the T1's cores clock slightly higher, the 695’s newer architecture and additional cores provide a noticeable performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The 695 also benefits from an integrated 5G modem, offering future-proofing. RAM speed is not specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X to balance cost and performance. Thermal management will be crucial; the 695’s increased performance could lead to more heat generation under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the unspecified mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo T1 offers 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in 28 minutes. The Poco X4 Pro 5G significantly outpaces it with 67W charging, achieving 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Poco X4 Pro 5G also supports PD3.0 and QC3 fast charging protocols, offering wider compatibility. This faster charging is a major advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680) if you need a reliable, efficient smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize a clean software experience without the need for 5G connectivity. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer faster charging speeds, the benefits of 5G, and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding applications and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The 695’s GPU is a step up from the 680, but it’s not a dedicated gaming chipset. Sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G's software include a lot of pre-installed bloatware?
Xiaomi’s MIUI software is known for including pre-installed apps and services. While many can be uninstalled, it’s a common complaint among users. The vivo T1 is likely to offer a cleaner, more streamlined software experience with less bloatware.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 44W and 67W?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging can add a significant amount of battery life in a short period, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their phone quickly. The 44W on the vivo T1 is still respectable, but noticeably slower.
