The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This in-depth comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco M4 Pro edges out the vivo T1 thanks to its brighter display, longer charging time, and impressive battery endurance. While the Snapdragon 680 offers decent performance, the Poco's overall package provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 04 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Starry Sky, Ice Dawn | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2153 | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 100.18 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318444 (v9)
GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680)
- Faster charging (44W)
- Slightly more efficient chipset
- Compact design (generally)
- Less bright display
- Potentially less versatile camera
- Shorter battery life
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- Brighter display
- Exceptional battery life
- Likely more versatile camera
- PD3.0, QC3 charging support
- Slower charging (33W)
- Less efficient chipset
- Larger size (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display (737 nits vs. vivo T1's estimated 480-500 nits), making it easier to view content outdoors. While both offer a smooth 90Hz refresh rate, the Poco's higher brightness gives it a noticeable advantage. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Poco is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data.
Camera Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses. While specific camera specs are missing, Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera features in their budget offerings. The vivo T1's camera is competent, but likely not as feature-rich. Low-light performance is likely better on the Poco.
Performance
The vivo T1's Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, generally offers slightly better efficiency and potentially smoother performance in everyday tasks compared to the Poco M4 Pro's Helio G96 (12nm). However, the difference isn't massive, and both phones are capable of handling most apps and games without significant issues. Gaming performance will be similar, but the Snapdragon 680 might have a slight edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Poco M4 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours. The vivo T1's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Poco's longevity. The Poco's 33W charging is slower than the vivo T1's 44W, but the larger battery capacity compensates for this.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more efficient chipset and faster charging speeds. The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, exceptional battery life, and a more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones can handle casual gaming. The vivo T1's Snapdragon 680 might offer slightly better sustained performance, but neither is a dedicated gaming phone.
❓ Is the Poco M4 Pro's 'Infinite' contrast ratio a significant advantage?
No, 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term and doesn't provide quantifiable data. The Poco M4 Pro's brightness is a more tangible advantage.
