The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and vivo consistently delivers compelling options. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the vivo T1, powered by a Snapdragon 680, and the vivo Y55s (2023) with a MediaTek Dimensity 700. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo T1 emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and generally smoother performance. While the Y55s (2023) offers a decent experience, the T1's advantages in processing power and charging speed make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 04 | 2023, January 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, January 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Starry Sky, Ice Dawn | Black, Blue |
| Models | V2153 | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680)
- Faster Snapdragon 680 Chipset
- 44W Fast Charging
- Potentially Higher Refresh Rate Display
- Generally Smoother Performance
- May have slightly less refined software experience compared to Y55s
- Design might be less premium
vivo Y55s (2023)
- Potentially Longer Software Support
- More Affordable
- Reliable Everyday Performance
- Slower 18W Charging
- Less Powerful Dimensity 700 Chipset
- Slower Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with a Full HD+ resolution. Expect decent color accuracy and viewing angles, but don't anticipate OLED-level vibrancy. The T1 might have a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs 60Hz) which would contribute to a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely comparable, with both phones featuring a primary 50MP sensor. However, the Snapdragon 680's image signal processor (ISP) might offer slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Both will likely include ultrawide and macro lenses, but image quality will depend on software optimization.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the vivo T1 holds a clear advantage. Its 6nm process and Kryo 265 cores offer better efficiency and raw power compared to the Dimensity 700's 7nm Cortex-A76/A55 configuration. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the T1.
Battery Life
The vivo T1's 44W fast charging is a major differentiator. It can charge 50% in just 28 minutes, significantly faster than the Y55s' 18W charging. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the T1's faster charging makes it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680) is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a smoother overall experience, especially for gaming or multitasking. The vivo Y55s (2023) is a good option for those on a tighter budget who value a reliable, everyday smartphone with a focus on basic functionality and longer software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 better than the Dimensity 700?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680 generally offers better performance and efficiency due to its 6nm process and optimized cores.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The vivo T1 takes approximately 60-70 minutes to fully charge with its 44W charger, while the vivo Y55s (2023) takes around 2.5-3 hours with its 18W charger.
