The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 and OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank. While both phones operate within a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core hardware – specifically, their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dives deep into these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G is the better choice. Its 65W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 900 offers a performance edge. However, the vivo T1 remains a viable option for those seeking a reliable daily driver with decent efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 04 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min | 65W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Starry Sky, Ice Dawn | Gray Mirror, Bahama Blue |
| Models | V2153 | IV2201 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 182.18 |
vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680)
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 680's focus on power management.
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Competitive price point.
- Less powerful processor compared to the Dimensity 900.
- Slower charging speeds (44W vs 65W).
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
- Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Dimensity 900.
- Significantly faster 65W charging.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- May exhibit slightly shorter battery life compared to the vivo T1.
- Potentially higher price point.
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor OnePlus provide detailed display specs beyond the basic panel type. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the overall user experience. While both will likely offer adequate viewing angles and color reproduction, the Nord CE 2 5G’s processor may contribute to smoother scrolling and animations. Without specific brightness nits or color gamut coverage data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner; however, OnePlus historically focuses on display calibration, potentially offering a more accurate color profile.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera as their main selling point. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, given OnePlus’s history, may employ more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Dimensity 900’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced than the Snapdragon 680’s, offering greater potential for computational photography features. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light stills. We can assume both will include standard auxiliary lenses, but their quality is likely to be minimal.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo T1 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, with an octa-core configuration split between 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, conversely, utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 900, also on a 6nm process, but with a more performance-oriented CPU setup: 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 900 represent a significant architectural upgrade over the Kryo 265 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 680, translating to noticeably faster single-core performance and improved responsiveness. This will be most apparent in app launch times and demanding applications. While both chipsets are 5G capable, the Dimensity 900 generally offers superior 5G modem performance. The Snapdragon 680 prioritizes efficiency, while the Dimensity 900 aims for a balance of power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified in the provided data, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the charging speeds are a clear differentiator. The vivo T1 supports 44W wired charging, claiming a 50% charge in 28 minutes. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G boasts a significantly faster 65W SuperVOOC charging, which will likely achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes. This faster charging is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently find themselves with low battery levels. While a larger battery capacity on the vivo T1 might offer slightly longer overall runtime, the Nord CE 2 5G’s rapid charging minimizes downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo T1 (Snapdragon 680) if you need a dependable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and value efficient power consumption. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G if you prioritize faster charging speeds, smoother multitasking, and a more capable processor for gaming or content creation, even if it means slightly reduced battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 900 in the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 900 is a capable processor, sustained high loads can generate heat. However, MediaTek’s thermal management features and OnePlus’s cooling solutions should prevent significant throttling. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it shouldn’t render the phone unusable.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo T1 fast enough for daily use?
44W charging is respectable, and the claimed 50% charge in 28 minutes is adequate for many users. However, it’s considerably slower than the 65W charging on the Nord CE 2 5G. If you frequently need to quickly top up your battery, the slower charging speed might be a drawback.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 680 handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 900?
The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant advantage in multitasking. It will handle more apps running in the background and switch between them more smoothly than the Snapdragon 680. The vivo T1 will manage basic multitasking, but the Nord CE 2 5G offers a more fluid experience.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
This information is not provided. However, given the trend towards removing microSD card slots in mid-range phones, it's likely neither device supports expandable storage. Consider your storage needs carefully before purchasing.
