The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo T1 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52 are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you determine which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52 generally edges out the vivo T1 5G thanks to its brighter display, faster charging, and more established brand reputation. However, the vivo T1 5G might offer better value depending on pricing and regional availability. It's a close call!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 40 SA/NSA - Indonesia | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 09 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 14 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Indonesia | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) - Indonesia | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619Mali-G57 MC2 - Indonesia | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 - India | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlight Black, Rainbow Fantasy | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | V2141, V2157 | SM-A525F, SM-A525F/DS, SM-A525M, SM-A525M/DS |
| Price | About 180 EUR | C$ 699.00 / £ 129.99 / € 169.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 105h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.0 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 261282 (v8)
GeekBench: 5865 (v4.4), 1577 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo T1 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (25W)
- Reputable brand
- Slightly more expensive
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 720G)
Samsung Galaxy A52
- More affordable
- Decent 5G performance
- Good value for money
- Less bright display
- Slower charging (18W)
- Potentially lower camera quality
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52 boasts a significantly brighter display (794 nits) compared to the vivo T1 5G, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the vivo T1 5G's display is adequate, the A52's contrast ratio (infinite) provides a more immersive viewing experience. The A52 also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A52 likely has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded. The vivo T1 5G's camera is still good for the price point, but may lack some of the A52's refinements.
Performance
The Snapdragon 720G in the Galaxy A52 is generally more powerful than the Snapdragon 695 5G in the vivo T1 5G. While both handle everyday tasks well, the A52 will offer smoother performance in demanding games and multitasking scenarios. The Dimensity 810 variant of the T1 5G in Indonesia offers a slight performance boost over the Snapdragon 695.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A52's endurance rating of 105h is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the vivo T1 5G. While the T1 5G's battery is decent, the A52's optimization and larger battery capacity give it a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
The vivo T1 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a decent gaming experience. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a better choice for those who value a superior display, faster charging, and a more polished overall experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better 5G performance?
Both offer 5G, but the Snapdragon 720G in the Galaxy A52 might offer slightly more consistent 5G speeds due to its overall performance.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A52 still worth buying in [current year]?
Yes, the Galaxy A52 remains a solid choice, especially if you can find it at a discounted price. Its display and battery life are still impressive.