vivo S9e vs vivo V21s: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V21s edges out the S9e thanks to its slightly faster chipset, quicker charging, and potentially better camera optimization. However, the S9e might offer a more appealing price point depending on current deals. Ultimately, the V21s provides a more well-rounded experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S9e | vivo V21s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 03 | 2022, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 27 | Available. Released 2022, November 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 74.3 x 7.3 mm / 7.4 mm | 159.7 x 73.9 x 7.3 mm or 7.4 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168.8 / 171.5 g (5.96 oz) | 176 g / 177 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 820 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC5 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 63% in 30 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Starry Blue | Dusk Blue, Gradient |
| Models | V2048A | - |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 360 EUR |
vivo S9e
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 820)
- Potentially more affordable
- Stylish design
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less advanced camera
- May lack OIS
vivo V21s
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 800U)
- Faster charging (63% in 30 min)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Likely includes OIS
- Slightly more expensive
- Smaller display (potentially)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, likely with a 90Hz refresh rate (common for vivo devices in this range). The S9e likely has a slightly larger display, potentially around 6.44 inches, while the V21s is around 6.38 inches. Expect vibrant colors and deep blacks on both, but the V21s might have slightly better brightness and color accuracy due to potential calibration differences. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The V21s is generally considered to have a more advanced camera system. While both offer a primary 64MP sensor, the V21s often boasts improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The V21s also typically includes features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) which the S9e may lack. Selfie cameras are a strong point for both, with high-resolution front-facing cameras (likely 32MP or higher) and beauty modes.
Performance
The Dimensity 820 in the S9e holds a slight advantage over the Dimensity 800U in the V21s. The S9e's Cortex-A76 cores are clocked slightly higher. However, real-world performance differences might be minimal for everyday tasks. Gaming performance will be decent on both, but the S9e might handle more demanding titles slightly better. Both phones will likely have 8GB of RAM.
Battery Life
Both phones have a similar battery capacity (around 4000mAh). However, the V21s's 33W charging is significantly faster, claiming 63% charge in 30 minutes, while the S9e's charging is simply 33W. This means the V21s will recharge much quicker.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S9e? Users prioritizing a balance of performance and affordability, and who don't heavily rely on the absolute fastest charging speeds. Who should buy the vivo V21s? Those seeking a slightly more powerful processor, faster charging, and potentially superior camera capabilities, and are willing to pay a bit more.