vivo S9 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: Which Flagship Delivers the Best Performance and Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and faster charging, the Oppo Find X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the vivo S9 presents a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S9 | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 03 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 12 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 73.9 x 7.4 mm (6.24 x 2.91 x 0.29 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 66% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | V2072A | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S9
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better thermal management due to 6nm Dimensity 1100
- Fast 33W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
- Limited detailed specifications available
- Slower charging than Oppo Find X3 Pro
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 888
- Faster 65W wired charging and wireless charging options
- Higher peak display brightness
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- May require more frequent charging depending on usage
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and visible display in direct sunlight compared to the vivo S9 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, the Find X3 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), indicating deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The S9’s display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison challenging, but it likely targets a similar visual quality within its price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong camera capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Oppo Find X3 Pro likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, enabling superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Without specific sensor size or aperture data for the vivo S9, it’s difficult to assess its camera capabilities accurately. The Find X3 Pro’s camera system is likely more versatile, offering a wider range of shooting modes and features. We can assume both phones offer photo and video recording, but the quality and features will differ.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering a significant performance advantage over the vivo S9’s Dimensity 1100 (6nm). The Snapdragon 888’s architecture, with its faster core and more powerful GPU, translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and superior gaming performance. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known for potential thermal throttling under sustained load, a factor the Dimensity 1100, with its 6nm process, may mitigate to some extent. Both phones utilize an octa-core configuration, but the Snapdragon 888’s core arrangement is geared towards higher peak performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro has an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the vivo S9’s battery capacity is unknown, the Find X3 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 40% charge in just 10 minutes. The S9’s 33W charging, while respectable, is considerably slower. The Find X3 Pro also supports 30W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the S9. The combination of efficient power management and rapid charging gives the Find X3 Pro a clear edge in usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S9 if you need a capable daily driver with a decent camera and fast charging at a more accessible price point. It’s ideal for social media users, casual gamers, and those who don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and photography, and if you value the convenience of extremely fast charging and a potentially longer software support lifecycle.