Both the vivo S7 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, offering a blend of performance and features at accessible price points. While both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, key differences in charging speed, display characteristics, and pricing create distinct user experiences. This comparison dives deep into these nuances to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a potentially more streamlined software experience, the vivo S7 emerges as the winner. However, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G’s slightly lower price (depending on configuration) and proven endurance rating make it a compelling alternative, especially for those who value battery longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 03. Released 2020, August 08 | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | - |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 74.2 x 7.4 mm (6.25 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 1.3 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | V2020A | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318117 (v8)
GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S7
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially more refined software experience (depending on vivo’s FunTouch OS)
- Sleek design aesthetic (based on brand reputation)
- Battery capacity unknown, potentially smaller than Mi 10 Lite
- Limited display specifications available
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- Excellent 103-hour battery endurance rating
- 610 nits peak brightness provides good visibility
- Lower price point (depending on configuration)
- Slower 20W charging
- MIUI software can be divisive
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G’s measured 610 nits peak brightness. This suggests a reasonably bright panel suitable for most indoor and outdoor conditions. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim on the Xiaomi is typical marketing hyperbole for AMOLED panels. Without knowing the panel type on the vivo S7, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the lack of detailed specs suggests it may not be a primary selling point. Users prioritizing vibrant colors and deep blacks should lean towards the Xiaomi, assuming it utilizes an AMOLED panel as is common for the price.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, which is unhelpful. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. The quality of the main sensor and image processing algorithms will be the determining factors, and without further information, it’s impossible to declare a winner. Users serious about mobile photography should seek more detailed camera reviews.
Performance
Both the vivo S7 and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring the same CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world difference will likely come down to thermal management and software optimization. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G’s available RAM configurations (6GB in both 64GB and 128GB storage options) are standard for this price point, and should provide adequate multitasking capabilities. Without knowing the RAM type (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR5) on the vivo S7, it’s difficult to assess potential memory bandwidth differences.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the vivo S7’s battery capacity is unknown, its 33W wired charging significantly outpaces the Xiaomi’s 20W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4 standards. This means the vivo S7 will likely achieve a 0-100% charge much faster, minimizing downtime. The Xiaomi’s endurance rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day of moderate use, but the vivo S7’s faster charging could be a crucial advantage for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S7 if you need rapid 33W charging to minimize downtime and appreciate a design focused on aesthetics. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you prioritize maximizing battery life with its 103-hour endurance rating and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software, potentially benefiting from a lower entry price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chipset, but it won't deliver flagship-level gaming performance. Both phones should be able to run PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with stable frame rates. However, expect some frame drops during intense action sequences, and don't expect to max out the graphics settings.
❓ Is the 64GB storage option on the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G sufficient, or should I opt for the 128GB model?
64GB is becoming increasingly restrictive, especially with the growing size of apps and media files. If you plan to take a lot of photos and videos, or download many apps, the 128GB model is highly recommended. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G does not offer microSD card expansion, so you're locked into the storage you choose.
❓ How does Xiaomi's MIUI software compare to vivo's FunTouch OS in terms of user experience and bloatware?
MIUI is known for its extensive customization options but also for including a significant amount of pre-installed bloatware. FunTouch OS, while improving, historically has also been criticized for its aggressive battery management and sometimes cluttered interface. User preference plays a large role here, but those seeking a cleaner Android experience might prefer a different brand.
