The Realme X3 SuperZoom and vivo S7 represent interesting points in the mid-range 5G market. The X3 SuperZoom, leveraging the older but potent Snapdragon 855+, aims for raw performance. Conversely, the vivo S7 utilizes the more modern Snapdragon 765G, prioritizing 5G connectivity and a sleeker design. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and demanding tasks, the Realme X3 SuperZoom is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ provides a significant performance edge. However, the vivo S7 offers a more balanced package with a modern 5G modem and a potentially more refined user experience, making it suitable for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 03. Released 2020, August 08 | 2020, May 26. Released 2020, June 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 74.2 x 7.4 mm (6.25 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/3.4, 124mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 1.3 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired, 100% in 55 min |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue | Glacier Blue, Arctic White |
| Models | V2020A | RMX2086 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1316:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.0 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 477905 (v8)
GeekBench: 2579 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S7
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 855+
- Faster charging speed (55 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially more versatile camera system with 'SuperZoom' feature
- Older chipset architecture
- 5G modem may be less efficient than integrated solutions
Realme X3 SuperZoom
- Integrated 5G modem for efficient connectivity
- Slightly faster charging wattage (33W)
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 855+
- Limited camera details available
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of 1316:1, suggesting comparable color reproduction. However, the Realme X3 SuperZoom boasts a measured peak brightness of 437 nits, which, while not exceptional, provides a slightly more visible experience in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., AMOLED vs. LCD) are missing, but the Realme’s brightness advantage suggests a potentially superior viewing experience outdoors. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices places them behind current standards, but is typical for their price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The Realme X3 SuperZoom’s “SuperZoom” moniker suggests a focus on telephoto capabilities, potentially offering a more versatile zoom range. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality definitively. However, the marketing around the X3 SuperZoom implies a greater emphasis on camera features, potentially offering better low-light performance and more advanced image processing. The absence of details on the vivo S7’s camera system suggests a more standard approach.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X3 SuperZoom’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, offering a substantial performance advantage over the vivo S7’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) with its 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core. While the 765G integrates a 5G modem directly, the 855+’s superior CPU and GPU performance translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The 855+’s architecture (1x2.96 GHz + 3x2.42 GHz + 4x1.78 GHz) is geared towards sustained performance, while the 765G (1x2.4 GHz + 1x2.2 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz) prioritizes efficiency.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Realme X3 SuperZoom supports 30W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 55 minutes, while the vivo S7 offers 33W wired charging. The slightly faster charging speed of the vivo S7 provides a marginal convenience benefit, but the overall battery performance appears comparable. The similar endurance ratings suggest efficient power management on both devices, offsetting any differences in battery capacity (which is not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S7 if you need a well-rounded 5G experience with a focus on connectivity and a modern design. It’s ideal for social media users, casual gamers, and those who value a sleek aesthetic. Buy the Realme X3 SuperZoom if you prioritize performance above all else, particularly for gaming or demanding applications. It’s the better choice for power users and those who want the most processing capability for their money.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the vivo S7 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 765G is capable, it won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 855+ in the Realme X3 SuperZoom. Expect to play these games at medium settings for a smooth experience, but high settings may result in frame drops. The X3 SuperZoom will provide a more consistent and higher frame rate experience.
❓ How does the 5G connectivity differ between the vivo S7 and the Realme X3 SuperZoom?
The vivo S7’s Snapdragon 765G has an integrated 5G modem, which generally leads to more efficient power consumption when using 5G networks. The Realme X3 SuperZoom relies on an external 5G modem, which may result in slightly higher battery drain during 5G usage. However, the practical difference in everyday use is likely to be minimal.
❓ Is the 'SuperZoom' feature on the Realme X3 SuperZoom a significant advantage over the vivo S7's camera?
The 'SuperZoom' feature implies the Realme X3 SuperZoom has a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing for higher optical zoom levels without significant image degradation. Without specific camera specs for the vivo S7, it's difficult to say definitively, but the X3 SuperZoom likely offers more versatility for capturing distant subjects.
