The vivo S7, released in 2020, represented a strong mid-range offering. Now, the Honor 300 Ultra arrives as a modern flagship. This comparison dissects the generational leap in processing power and charging capabilities, helping you determine if the newer model justifies its higher price point.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and raw performance, the Honor 300 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and blazing-fast 100W charging significantly outperform the vivo S7. However, the S7 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users with less demanding needs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 03. Released 2020, August 08 | 2024, December 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, December 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 158.8 x 74.2 x 7.4 mm (6.25 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.8 x 75.3 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Giant rhino glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x2.95 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 1.3 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/3.0, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.8x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 100W wired, 59% in 15 min
80W wireless, 39% in 15 min
5W reverse wired
Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gradient Blue | Black, White |
| Models | V2020A | - |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) | - |
vivo S7
- More affordable price point
- Still capable for everyday tasks
- Compact and lightweight design (likely)
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower charging speeds
- Outdated chipset and software support
Honor 300 Ultra
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Ultra-fast 100W wired and 80W wireless charging
- Advanced camera system (expected)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
While specific display specs for the vivo S7 are unavailable, it likely features a standard AMOLED panel. The Honor 300 Ultra, being a flagship, is expected to boast a higher-quality display, potentially with LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates. The difference in display quality will likely be noticeable in brightness, color accuracy, and smoothness, benefiting users who consume a lot of video content or play graphically intensive games. The S7's display, while adequate, will likely lack the vibrancy and responsiveness of a modern flagship.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the vivo S7, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Honor 300 Ultra, as a flagship, is expected to feature a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the 765G’s, enabling better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Honor 300 Ultra will likely excel in low-light photography and video recording, areas where the S7 will likely struggle. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Honor 300 Ultra is also highly probable, further enhancing image clarity.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S7’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a capable mid-range processor with an octa-core configuration peaking at 2.4 GHz. However, the Honor 300 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a generational leap forward. The 4nm process node offers significantly improved power efficiency and transistor density, resulting in substantially higher performance and reduced thermal throttling. The 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, will deliver a dramatically faster experience in demanding applications and games compared to the S7’s Kryo 475 Prime. The Honor 300 Ultra will also benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
The vivo S7 offers 33W wired charging, a respectable speed for its time. The Honor 300 Ultra, however, completely eclipses this with 100W wired charging, capable of adding 59% charge in just 15 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their phone. Furthermore, the Honor 300 Ultra adds 80W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the S7. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Honor 300 Ultra’s superior charging speeds mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering a more convenient charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S7 if you need a capable, affordable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t require the absolute latest in processing power. Buy the Honor 300 Ultra if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games, content creation, and benefit from incredibly fast charging – especially if you frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor 300 Ultra get noticeably hotter than the vivo S7 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is powerful, its 4nm process and advanced thermal management features are designed to mitigate heat. However, it will likely generate more heat than the Snapdragon 765G in the vivo S7 during prolonged, demanding gaming. The Honor 300 Ultra will likely have a more sophisticated cooling system to handle this, but some throttling is still possible.
❓ Is the 100W charging on the Honor 300 Ultra safe for the battery's long-term health?
Honor employs sophisticated charging algorithms and safety mechanisms to protect the battery during fast charging. While fast charging *can* theoretically contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over years of use, the benefits of convenience and speed generally outweigh this concern for most users. The Honor 300 Ultra's charging system is designed to minimize any negative impact.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the vivo S7 still hold up for basic tasks like browsing and social media in 2024?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G remains perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media, and streaming video. It won't offer the same level of responsiveness as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but it will provide a smooth and functional experience for these common use cases.
