The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing and the vivo S6 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in their respective chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 768G offers a noticeable performance edge over the vivo S6 5G’s Exynos 980, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the vivo S6 5G provides a more balanced package for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 31. Released 2020, April 12 | 2020, May 11. Released 2020, May 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.7 x 8.7 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White/Blue, Streamer Secret | Mint, Blue, Red, Purple, White |
| Models | V1962A, V1962BA | - |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
vivo S6 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Snapdragon 768G offers superior gaming performance.
- More efficient 7nm process for potentially better battery life.
- MIUI software can be resource-intensive and feature bloat.
- Potentially less refined camera image processing.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks.
- Potentially more refined software experience (vivo’s Funtouch OS).
- Competitive price point.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Exynos 980 lags behind Snapdragon 768G in demanding tasks.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Display quality is likely similar, with both targeting a smooth experience for everyday use. Bezels are expected to be comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will likely be tuned for vibrant, rather than strictly accurate, visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price points, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations, focusing on versatility rather than flagship-level image quality. The Redmi K30 5G Racing, typical of Xiaomi, likely prioritizes a high-resolution main sensor, potentially with pixel binning for improved low-light performance. The vivo S6 5G may lean towards more software-driven image processing, aiming for pleasing, social media-ready results. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G (7nm), featuring a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz. This architecture, built on a smaller 7nm process, generally translates to higher sustained performance and better thermal efficiency compared to the vivo S6 5G’s Exynos 980 (8nm). The Exynos 980, with its Cortex-A77 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz, is still capable, but the Snapdragon 768G’s more modern architecture and process node give it a clear advantage in demanding tasks like gaming. The Redmi K30’s GPU will also outperform the Exynos’s, leading to higher frame rates and smoother gameplay. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs with similar mid-tier Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30 5G Racing’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 57 minutes. The vivo S6 5G, limited to 18W charging, will take considerably longer to replenish its battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi K30 effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Snapdragon 768G’s improved efficiency also contributes to potentially better battery life during intensive use, offsetting any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S6 5G if you need a well-rounded device with a focus on everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and appreciate a potentially more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing if you prioritize gaming performance, faster charging speeds, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software, even if it means potentially more aggressive battery management.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 980 in the vivo S6 5G suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 980, being built on an 8nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling compared to the Snapdragon 768G’s 7nm process. While it can handle moderate gaming, extended sessions with demanding titles may result in reduced performance as the chip heats up. The Redmi K30 5G Racing is better equipped to maintain consistent performance under sustained load.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Redmi K30 5G Racing compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While the Redmi K30 5G Racing supports 30W charging, it utilizes Xiaomi’s proprietary charging protocol. While it *may* work with some PD chargers, it won’t achieve the full 30W speed unless you use a compatible Xiaomi charger. Using a standard PD charger will likely result in slower charging speeds.
❓ How does MIUI on the Redmi K30 5G Racing impact battery life compared to vivo’s Funtouch OS on the S6 5G?
MIUI is known for its feature-richness, but also for its aggressive background app management and potential for bloatware. This can sometimes lead to shorter battery life compared to more streamlined operating systems like vivo’s Funtouch OS. However, MIUI also offers extensive customization options for power management, allowing users to optimize battery life to their preferences.
