The Realme X50 5G and vivo S6 5G represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range 5G market. Both devices aimed to deliver 5G connectivity at a more accessible price point, but they took different approaches to achieving this. The Realme X50 5G prioritized raw performance with the Snapdragon 765G, while the vivo S6 5G opted for Samsung’s Exynos 980. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme X50 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, coupled with 30W fast charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the vivo S6 5G’s Exynos 980 and slower 18W charging. While the S6 may appeal to those prioritizing a specific aesthetic, the X50 delivers a more well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 31. Released 2020, April 12 | 2020, July 08. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.7 x 8.7 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | - | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White/Blue, Streamer Secret | Jungle Green, Ice Silver |
| Models | V1962A, V1962BA | RMX2144 |
| Price | - | About 500 EUR |
vivo S6 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups
- Snapdragon 765G offers better overall performance
- Potentially better thermal management due to 7nm process
- Display details are unknown, potentially lacking features like high refresh rate
- Camera performance relies heavily on software optimization
Realme X50 5G
- Sleek design aesthetic (typical of vivo S series)
- Exynos 980 is still a capable processor for everyday tasks
- Samsung’s brand recognition may appeal to some users
- Slower 18W charging is a significant drawback
- Exynos 980 generally underperforms compared to Snapdragon 765G in demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The Realme X50 5G’s 120Hz refresh rate (a common feature for this model, though not explicitly stated in the provided data) would provide a smoother scrolling experience compared to the standard 60Hz expected on the vivo S6 5G. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar target market.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility. However, the Realme X50 5G’s brand history suggests a focus on delivering competitive camera performance in its price range. The Exynos 980’s ISP is capable, but Qualcomm’s image signal processing is often praised for its dynamic range and color accuracy. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) has a slight edge in CPU clock speeds (2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime vs 2.2 GHz Cortex-A77) and benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture. The Snapdragon 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU is also generally more capable than the Exynos 980’s Mali-G76 MP5. While both use a similar 6x1.8 GHz core configuration for efficiency, the 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 765G generally translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Exynos 980 (8nm) is still a capable chip, but the Snapdragon 765G offers a more robust performance profile.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 5G’s 30W fast charging is a clear advantage over the vivo S6 5G’s 18W charging. The X50 5G can reportedly reach 70% charge in just 30 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential difference in mAh. The Snapdragon 765G’s efficiency also contributes to potentially better battery life under load, despite any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S6 5G if you prioritize a sleek design and are less concerned with maximizing gaming performance or charging speed. It’s a good choice for everyday tasks and social media. Buy the Realme X50 5G if you’re a mobile gamer, frequently stream video, or simply want a phone that charges quickly and feels responsive in all situations. The X50 is the better option for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 980 in the vivo S6 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 980, built on an 8nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling compared to the Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm process. While it can handle casual gaming, extended sessions with graphically demanding titles may lead to noticeable performance drops as the phone heats up. The Realme X50 5G is the better choice for serious mobile gamers.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Realme X50 5G compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While the Realme X50 5G supports 30W charging, it utilizes Realme’s proprietary Dart Charge protocol. While it *may* work with some PD chargers, it won’t necessarily achieve the full 30W speed. Using the included charger is recommended for optimal charging performance.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the Exynos 980 and Snapdragon 765G in terms of color accuracy and dynamic range?
Qualcomm’s image signal processors (ISPs) are generally known for producing images with more accurate colors and wider dynamic range. While the Exynos 980’s ISP is capable, the Snapdragon 765G typically delivers more natural-looking photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. This difference is often noticeable in side-by-side comparisons.
