vivo S5 vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ offers a substantial performance leap over the S5’s Snapdragon 712, coupled with faster 30W charging. However, the S5 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who don't demand top-tier processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S5 | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.22 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Icelandic Blue, Phantom Blue, Star Black | Papaya Orange |
| Models | V1932A | HD1925 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo S5
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable performance for everyday tasks
- Decent 22.5W fast charging
- Significantly less powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Likely inferior camera system
- Potentially lower build quality
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset for smooth performance
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Likely superior camera system with OIS
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load (depending on battery capacity)
- May be harder to find new
Display Comparison
While specific display specs beyond the chipsets aren't provided, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, as a flagship, likely featured a higher-quality panel with a higher refresh rate (90Hz was standard for the 7T Pro line) and potentially better color accuracy compared to the vivo S5. The 7nm process of the 855+ would allow for more power to be allocated to the display, potentially resulting in higher peak brightness. Bezels were also likely slimmer on the OnePlus device, contributing to a more premium feel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a precise comparison. However, given the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s flagship status, it likely featured a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The 855+ also includes a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and better low-light performance. The S5 likely relied on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on the S5 is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is significantly more powerful than the vivo S5’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 712’s Kryo 360 Gold core at 2.3 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience. The 7nm process node of the 855+ also offers better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The 712 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo S5’s 22.5W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed will result in significantly quicker top-ups. The more efficient 7nm process of the 855+ also contributes to better battery life under load, despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity than the S5. Users who frequently use their phones throughout the day will benefit from the OnePlus’s faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S5 if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize affordability. Its 22.5W charging and efficient chipset provide acceptable battery life for moderate use. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps, graphically intensive games, and benefit from faster charging speeds and 5G connectivity, even if it comes at a higher price point.