vivo S30 vs Oppo Find X7: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Oppo Find X7 emerges as the stronger contender. The Dimensity 9300’s superior CPU architecture and 100W charging significantly outperform the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and 90W charging of the vivo S30, justifying the potential price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S30 | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired Bypass charging | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow, Pink | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | V2464A | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 520 EUR |
vivo S30
- More power-efficient chipset (Snapdragon 7 Gen 4)
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Slower charging speed (90W vs 100W)
- May struggle with demanding games
Oppo Find X7
- Significantly faster CPU and GPU (Dimensity 9300)
- Faster charging (100W, 100% in 26 minutes)
- Potentially superior camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 9300 may consume more power
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely employ AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), specific details like peak brightness and refresh rates are missing. However, the core difference lies in the processing power driving the display. The Dimensity 9300 in the Find X7 has a more powerful GPU, potentially enabling smoother animations and higher frame rates in graphically intensive applications. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone prioritizes variable refresh rate for power saving, but the Find X7’s chipset could compensate with more efficient rendering.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Oppo generally prioritizes camera technology in its Find series. The Find X7 likely features a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 9300, enabling superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance. While the vivo S30 will likely offer a competent camera experience, the Find X7 is expected to deliver more detailed and dynamic images, especially in challenging conditions. The absence of sensor size data makes a definitive statement impossible, but Oppo’s history suggests a larger sensor.
Performance
The Oppo Find X7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300 is the clear winner in raw processing power. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and three additional Cortex-X4 cores, significantly surpasses the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 prime core. The Dimensity 9300’s architecture is designed for sustained performance, crucial for demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. While the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4’s 4nm process is efficient, it can’t match the sheer horsepower of the Dimensity 9300. The Find X7 will likely exhibit lower frame drops and faster loading times in demanding games.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7’s 100W charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 26 minutes. The vivo S30’s 90W charging is also fast, but the 10-minute difference can be substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 9300’s higher power draw may result in slightly shorter battery life compared to the more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, but the faster charging mitigates this concern.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S30 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and efficient performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t demand the absolute highest processing power. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, intensive multitasking, and benefit from significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.