vivo S30 Pro mini vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Performance and Battery Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and rapid charging, the vivo S30 Pro mini is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ offers a significant performance leap. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo provides a more efficient and balanced experience with excellent battery life and a bright display, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S30 Pro mini | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 06 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~461 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 97.6 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow, Pink | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2465A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo S30 Pro mini
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 9300+)
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Battery life potentially lower than Edge 40 Neo
- Limited battery information available
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright display (1073 nits)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 7030)
- Slower charging speed (68W)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a display capable of reaching 1073 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo S30 Pro mini’s display specifications are currently unavailable, it’s likely to be a high-quality panel given the phone’s positioning. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor use. We anticipate the S30 Pro mini will focus on color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate to complement its gaming focus, but without specific data, it’s difficult to assess. Bezels are likely comparable given both phones target a similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details beyond 'Photo / Video' for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are limited. The Edge 40 Neo likely employs a standard sensor setup for its price point, focusing on computational photography. The vivo S30 Pro mini’s camera specifications are also currently unknown, but given vivo’s history, it’s reasonable to expect a focus on image quality and potentially advanced features like OIS. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the S30 Pro mini’s processing power could give it an edge in post-processing and low-light performance.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The vivo S30 Pro mini’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) features a cutting-edge CPU configuration – a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores – designed for peak performance. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9300+ offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030, meaning the S30 Pro mini should sustain higher performance for longer periods. The S30 Pro mini is geared towards demanding tasks, while the Edge 40 Neo is optimized for smooth everyday use.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h. This suggests excellent power efficiency. The vivo S30 Pro mini’s battery capacity is unknown, but it compensates with incredibly fast 90W wired charging, including PD, reverse wired, and bypass charging. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is respectable, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, but the S30 Pro mini’s 90W system will likely offer a significantly faster full charge. The trade-off is clear: the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes longevity, while the S30 Pro mini prioritizes quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S30 Pro mini if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming, video editing, or demanding applications and value the convenience of 90W fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display, and a more streamlined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.