vivo S20 vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo S20 emerges as the better choice. While the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 5G still holds its own, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's superior efficiency, coupled with the S20's blazing-fast 90W charging, provides a more modern and convenient experience. The Reno 5G remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S20 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 28 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 06 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.4 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.31 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD Reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Gold, White | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | V2429A | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 880 EUR |
vivo S20
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor
- Likely benefits from newer camera algorithms
- Potentially higher price point
- Specific battery capacity unknown
Oppo Reno 5G
- Lower price point
- Capable Snapdragon 855 processor
- Established brand reputation
- Slow 20W charging
- Less efficient Snapdragon 855 processor
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the S20's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel with a high refresh rate. The Reno 5G also likely uses AMOLED. However, the key difference lies in the underlying processors' ability to drive these displays efficiently. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's newer architecture should result in less strain on the battery when using high refresh rates. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of phones in this price bracket. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, but both brands generally offer decent color profiles.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 will likely offer improved image processing capabilities compared to the 855. This means better dynamic range, noise reduction, and potentially more accurate colors in the S20. The S20 likely benefits from newer computational photography algorithms. The absence of details on sensor sizes prevents a definitive statement, but a newer phone generally implies a more advanced camera system.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The vivo S20's Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency over the Oppo Reno 5G's Snapdragon 855 (7nm). While the 855 boasts higher clock speeds (2.84 GHz vs 2.63 GHz peak), the 7 Gen 3's newer Cortex-A715 cores and smaller process node deliver better performance-per-watt. This translates to cooler operation and less throttling during sustained workloads. The S20's CPU configuration (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency, while the 855's Kryo 485 cores are older generation. Gamers will find the S20 more consistent in longer sessions.
Battery Life
The battery capacity of both phones is unknown. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo S20's 90W wired charging is a massive advantage, allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Oppo Reno 5G's 20W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. Even with a larger battery, the Reno 5G's slower charging will be a drawback for users who frequently need to top up their devices. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's efficiency also contributes to better overall battery life in the S20.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S20 if you prioritize battery life, fast charging, and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks and light gaming. Its 90W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you're seeking a capable phone at a significantly lower price point and are willing to compromise on charging speed and long-term efficiency. It's a solid option for users who don't demand the latest features.