vivo S19 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a complete, uncompromising experience, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear winner. Its superior chipset, brighter display, and longer battery life justify the higher price. However, the vivo S19 offers compelling value for those seeking strong performance and fast charging without the ultra-premium cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S19 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 30 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 30 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.7 x 7.2 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.28 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8GHz Cortex-A510) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Peach, Light Blue | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2364A | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 320 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo S19
- 80W Fast Charging: Significantly faster recharge times.
- Potentially Lower Price: Offers a more accessible entry point.
- Sleek Design: vivo is known for its attractive aesthetics.
- Less Powerful Chipset: Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 lags behind the 8 Gen 3.
- Unknown Camera Capabilities: Lacks detailed camera specs for comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Top-Tier Performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers exceptional speed.
- Brilliant Display: 1447 nits peak brightness for excellent visibility.
- Long Battery Life: 13:49h active use provides all-day power.
- Higher Price: Significantly more expensive than the vivo S19.
- Slower Charging: 45W charging is slower than the S19’s 80W.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo S19’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s panel technology, likely LTPO AMOLED, offers adaptive refresh rates for improved power efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s larger screen real estate and higher peak brightness are particularly beneficial for content creators and media consumers. The S19, lacking these specifics, likely targets a balance between color accuracy and power consumption, suitable for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, making a precise comparison difficult. However, given Samsung’s history, the S24 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The S24 Ultra’s camera system is expected to offer more versatile zoom capabilities and advanced video recording features. The vivo S19 will likely focus on delivering good image quality for social media and everyday photography, but may lack the advanced features and dynamic range of the S24 Ultra.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) features a 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 cores and 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 cores, and 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520 cores, delivering substantially higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the vivo S19’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) with its 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.8GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the S24 Ultra. The S19’s 7 Gen 3 is still capable, but will show its limits in graphically intensive applications. The S24 Ultra's superior thermal design, implied by its flagship status, will also minimize throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieves an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the vivo S19’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging significantly outperforms the S24 Ultra’s 45W charging, allowing for a much faster recharge. The S24 Ultra reaches 65% charge in 30 minutes, while the S19 will likely achieve a full charge in a similar timeframe. This makes the S19 a more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The S24 Ultra’s larger battery capacity, combined with the efficiency of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, provides longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S19 if you need a stylish phone with excellent fast charging (80W) and solid mid-range performance for everyday tasks and casual gaming. You'll appreciate the value proposition and the sleek design. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you demand the absolute best in performance, camera capabilities, and display quality, and are willing to pay a premium for a device that excels in all areas, especially demanding tasks like video editing and prolonged gaming sessions.