vivo S17 vs Xiaomi 13 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Lite emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers a performance edge thanks to its 4nm process, and the brighter 938 nit display provides a superior viewing experience. While the vivo S17’s 80W charging is faster, the 13 Lite’s excellent endurance rating mitigates this difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S17 | Xiaomi 13 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 31 | 2023, February 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.2 x 72.7 x 7.2 mm (6.27 x 2.86 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 644 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 30 min | 67W wired, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Lite Blue, Lite Pink |
| Models | V2283A | - |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 534143 (v9) GeekBench: 2936 (v5.1), 2434 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S17
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Proven Snapdragon 778G+ performance
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Older 6nm chipset may throttle under heavy load
- Display specifications are unknown and likely inferior to the 13 Lite
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Brighter 938 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
- Excellent 93-hour endurance rating
- Slower 67W charging compared to the vivo S17
- Camera details are lacking, making it hard to assess quality
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Lite immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 938 nits, significantly exceeding what we’d expect in this price bracket. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels (though not explicitly stated), the Xiaomi’s higher brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The vivo S17’s display specifications are currently unknown, making a direct comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to match the 13 Lite’s peak performance.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the camera experience will likely hinge on sensor size and image processing. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both will offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which may struggle in low-light scenarios. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this segment are unlikely to be a significant factor in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Lite’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, built on a 4nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the vivo S17’s Snapdragon 778G+ (6nm). The 7 Gen 1 features newer Cortex-A710 cores, promising improved CPU performance and efficiency. While both are octa-core CPUs, the 7 Gen 1’s configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) is optimized for sustained performance. The S17’s older Cortex-A78 cores, while still capable, will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under prolonged load. The 4nm process of the 7 Gen 1 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Lite boasts an impressive endurance rating of 93 hours, indicating excellent battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified). The vivo S17 counters with 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 30 minutes. The 13 Lite’s 67W charging takes 40 minutes for a full charge. While the S17 is faster, the 13 Lite’s superior endurance means users may not need to charge as frequently. The efficiency gains from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s 4nm process likely contribute to the 13 Lite’s longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S17 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are heavily invested in the vivo ecosystem. Its 80W charging can top up the battery quickly, making it ideal for users constantly on the go. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Lite if you value display quality, a more modern chipset, and a balanced overall experience. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 provides a noticeable performance boost for gaming and demanding applications.