vivo S17 vs Oppo Reno10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo S17 edges out the Oppo Reno10 Pro thanks to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset. While the Reno10 Pro boasts impressive battery endurance and a brighter display, the S17’s performance advantage in demanding tasks and faster charging make it the more compelling all-rounder.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S17 | Oppo Reno10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 31 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 08 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 30 min | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3 Reverse wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | V2283A | CPH2525 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
vivo S17
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset
- Faster charging speed (80W)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Battery life data unavailable
- No reverse wired charging
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- Excellent battery life (11:05h active use)
- Brighter display (793 nits)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro features a display capable of reaching 793 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While the vivo S17’s display specs are not provided, the Reno10 Pro’s brightness level suggests a superior experience in direct sunlight. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the Reno10 Pro’s measured brightness gives it a clear edge for users who frequently use their phones outdoors. The absence of refresh rate data for the S17 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Reno10 Pro’s panel is likely optimized for smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are unavailable for the Oppo Reno10 Pro. However, Oppo typically focuses on strong image processing algorithms and capable main sensors in this series. The vivo S17’s camera specs are also limited, but the focus should be on the primary sensor’s performance. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a significant omission, as OIS is crucial for stable video recording and sharper low-light photos. We can assume both phones will offer a variety of shooting modes, but image quality will ultimately depend on the quality of the sensors and software processing.
Performance
Both the vivo S17 and Oppo Reno10 Pro are powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 778G series, but the S17 utilizes the Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the Reno10 Pro uses the standard Snapdragon 778G 5G. The ‘+’ variant in the S17 features a slightly higher CPU clock speed – 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2.4 GHz in the Reno10 Pro – and a more powerful GPU. This translates to a noticeable, though not massive, performance uplift in graphically intensive tasks like gaming. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, ensuring good efficiency, but the S17’s higher clock speeds will result in slightly higher thermal output under sustained load. The Reno10 Pro’s CPU configuration includes 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, compared to the S17’s 3x 2.4 GHz cores, further highlighting the S17’s performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:05h and an endurance rating of 104h. This suggests excellent power efficiency. The vivo S17, while featuring 80W wired charging (matching the Reno10 Pro), lacks published battery life data. Both phones support 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in 30 minutes (S17) and utilizing PD3.0 and QC3 standards (Reno10 Pro). The Reno10 Pro’s reverse wired charging capability is a unique feature, allowing it to charge other devices, a convenience the S17 lacks. The Reno10 Pro’s longer battery life is a significant advantage for users who prioritize all-day usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S17 if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of extremely fast 80W charging. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if long battery life is paramount, and you frequently consume content outdoors where the brighter display will be beneficial. The Reno10 Pro also appeals to users who appreciate reverse wired charging for topping up accessories.