vivo continues to impress with its stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The S16e and V27 Pro are two compelling options, each targeting slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the stronger contender thanks to its superior chipset (Dimensity 8200), brighter display, and generally more advanced features. While the S16e offers a solid experience, the V27 Pro provides a noticeable performance and visual upgrade, justifying its likely higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm or 7.8 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187.7 g or 189 g (6.63 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | V2239A | V2230 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S16e
- Stylish Design
- Fast Charging (66W)
- Balanced Performance
- Likely more affordable
- Older Chipset (Exynos 1080)
- Lower Display Brightness (estimated)
- Potentially less advanced camera features
vivo V27 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 Chipset
- Brighter and Higher Contrast Display
- Excellent Battery Life (121h Endurance)
- Likely Superior Camera Performance
- Higher Price
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 978 nits peak brightness compared to the S16e's likely lower brightness (spec not provided, but generally lower than V27 Pro). The V27 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image depth and color accuracy. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the V27 Pro's brightness advantage is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on camera capabilities, but the V27 Pro likely holds an advantage. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the V27 Pro's inclusion of a more modern chipset often translates to better image processing and computational photography features. Expect improved low-light performance and video recording quality on the V27 Pro. Both likely feature a primary sensor with OIS.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8200 in the V27 Pro is a clear winner here. It's built on a 4nm process, offering superior efficiency and performance compared to the Exynos 1080 (5nm) in the S16e. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the V27 Pro. Both phones utilize similar CPU core configurations, but the Dimensity 8200's architecture and manufacturing process give it a significant edge.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 121h, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the S16e's battery capacity is not explicitly stated, both phones feature 66W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 19 minutes. The V27 Pro's superior battery optimization, thanks to its more efficient chipset, likely contributes to its longer endurance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S16e? Users prioritizing a balance of style and affordability, and who don't heavily rely on demanding gaming or intensive multitasking. Who should buy the vivo V27 Pro? Those seeking a premium experience with a powerful processor, vibrant display, and enhanced camera capabilities, and are willing to invest a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo S16e good for gaming?
The S16e can handle casual gaming, but demanding titles might experience some lag. The V27 Pro's more powerful chipset is better suited for smoother gaming performance.
❓ Which vivo phone has better camera quality?
The vivo V27 Pro is expected to offer better camera quality due to its more advanced chipset and likely improved image processing capabilities.
