The vivo S series is known for its stylish design and impressive camera capabilities, particularly for selfies. The S16e and S16 Pro are the latest iterations, but which one offers the best value and performance? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S16 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost. While both offer fast 66W charging, the Pro's superior processing power and likely improved camera features make it the better choice for most users, despite a potentially higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2022, December 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm or 7.8 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187.7 g or 189 g (6.63 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Black, Mint |
| Models | V2239A | V2245A |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 400 EUR |
vivo S16e
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Decent camera for selfies
- Fast 66W charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially lower camera quality compared to Pro
- May lack some premium features
vivo S16 Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 8200
- Likely better camera system
- Premium features
- Fast 66W charging
- Higher price
- Design may be similar to S16e
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature OLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The S16 Pro may have a slightly larger display and potentially higher peak brightness, but detailed specifications are needed for a definitive comparison. Expect similar resolution (likely FHD+).
Camera Comparison
While both are expected to excel in selfie photography (a hallmark of the S series), the S16 Pro likely features a more advanced main camera system. Expect improvements in low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality. The S16 Pro may also include additional camera features like improved optical image stabilization (OIS). Specific megapixel counts and sensor sizes are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Dimensity 8200 in the S16 Pro is a clear winner here. It's built on a more advanced 4nm process and boasts higher clock speeds across its cores compared to the Exynos 1080 in the S16e. This translates to faster app loading, smoother gaming, and overall snappier performance. The S16e is still capable, but the Pro offers a noticeable upgrade.
Battery Life
Both phones share the same 66W wired charging, promising a 50% charge in approximately 19 minutes. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4500-5000mAh), suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. Software optimization could play a role in real-world endurance.
Buying Guide
The vivo S16e is ideal for users on a tighter budget who prioritize a stylish design and decent camera performance for everyday use. The vivo S16 Pro is for those who demand flagship-level performance, smoother multitasking, and potentially better camera quality, and are willing to pay a premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo S16 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and camera quality, the S16 Pro's Dimensity 8200 chipset and likely improved camera system make it a worthwhile investment. However, if you're on a budget, the S16e still offers a solid experience.
❓ What is the difference in camera quality between the two phones?
While both excel in selfies, the S16 Pro is expected to have a more advanced main camera system with better low-light performance and dynamic range. Specific camera specs and sample photos would be needed for a definitive comparison.
