Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The vivo S16e and Motorola Moto G52 are both compelling options in the mid-range market, but cater to different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S16e clearly takes the performance crown with its significantly faster chipset and rapid 66W charging. However, the Moto G52 offers a more budget-friendly price point and a clean Android experience. If speed and charging are key, the S16e wins; for value, the G52 is a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm or 7.8 mm | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187.7 g or 189 g (6.63 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | V2239A | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo S16e
- Superior Performance (Exynos 1080)
- Ultra-Fast 66W Charging
- Excellent Selfie Camera
- Vibrant OLED Display
- Potentially Higher Price
- Software may have more bloatware
Motorola Moto G52
- Budget-Friendly Price
- Clean Android Experience
- Vibrant AMOLED Display (120Hz)
- Decent Camera System
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 680)
- Slower 30W Charging
- Less Powerful Camera
Display Comparison
The Moto G52 boasts a 6.6-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The vivo S16e typically features an OLED display, likely with a similar resolution and refresh rate, but specific details can vary by region. Both offer good viewing experiences, but the AMOLED on the G52 provides slightly better contrast and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
The vivo S16e is known for its excellent selfie camera capabilities, often featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor and advanced beauty modes. The Moto G52 has a triple-camera system, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. While the G52's main camera can produce good results, the S16e likely offers superior selfie quality and potentially better overall image processing.
Performance
Here's where the vivo S16e shines. The Exynos 1080 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 680. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the S16e. The Moto G52 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games or heavy workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo S16e's 66W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Moto G52's 30W charging is slower, but the battery capacity is likely comparable, meaning overall battery life might be similar, but charging time will be significantly longer on the G52.
Buying Guide
The vivo S16e is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a focus on selfie camera quality. The Motorola Moto G52 is a great choice for those seeking a reliable, budget-friendly phone with a near-stock Android experience and a decent display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo S16e worth the extra cost?
If performance and fast charging are your priorities, the S16e's extra cost is justified. However, if you're on a tight budget and value a clean Android experience, the Moto G52 is a compelling alternative.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Motorola is known for providing timely Android updates and a near-stock Android experience. vivo's software support can be less consistent, though they have improved in recent years.
