vivo S16 vs vivo V23 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S16 takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering a smoother and more responsive experience. While the V23 5G boasts impressive battery life and a vibrant display, the S16's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 | vivo V23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, Gold | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | V2244A | V2130, V2303 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9) GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S16
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Likely Higher Refresh Rate Display
- Sleek Design
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- Selfie Camera may not be as strong as V23 5G
vivo V23 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (103h Endurance)
- Vibrant Display (629 nits)
- Good Selfie Camera
- Stylish Design
- Less Powerful Processor (Dimensity 920)
- Slower Charging (44W)
- Performance may struggle with demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The V23 5G measures a peak brightness of 629 nits, which is impressive, while the S16 is expected to have similar brightness levels. The V23 5G's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but it suggests excellent image quality. The S16 likely has a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) for smoother scrolling, though this isn't explicitly stated.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The V23 5G is known for its selfie camera capabilities, often featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor. The S16 is expected to have a versatile rear camera setup with a main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the S16's more powerful processor could provide better image processing and low-light performance.
Performance
This is where the S16 truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 is a flagship-level chipset, significantly outperforming the Dimensity 920 in the V23 5G. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the S16. The Dimensity 920 is still capable, but it won't handle demanding tasks as efficiently.
Battery Life
The V23 5G holds a clear advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 103 hours. The S16's battery capacity is likely smaller, and while its 66W charging is faster (50% in 19 minutes vs. 68% in 30 minutes for the V23 5G), it won't match the V23 5G's longevity.
Buying Guide
The vivo S16 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming. If you're a content creator or someone who values a smooth, lag-free experience, the S16 is the way to go. The vivo V23 5G is a great option for those who prioritize long battery life and a visually appealing design, and are less concerned with raw processing power.