vivo S16 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding maximum performance in demanding applications and gaming, the vivo S16 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo delivers superior battery life and a brighter display, making it the better choice for everyday users and media consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2244A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo S16
- More powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- Qualcomm’s ISP for image processing
- Likely lower battery life
- Older 7nm process may generate more heat
- Display specs are unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More efficient 6nm chipset
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 870
- May struggle with extremely demanding games
- Camera specs are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the vivo S16’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from newer display technology, offering improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of detailed display specs for the S16 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo clearly excels in this area.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS suggests neither phone prioritizes flagship-level camera performance. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s ‘Photo / Video’ designation indicates a focus on versatile camera capabilities, but without specific details, it’s difficult to assess its image quality. The vivo S16’s camera performance will likely rely heavily on Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 870. Given the lack of detailed specs, it’s reasonable to assume both phones offer adequate camera performance for social media and casual photography, but won’t compete with dedicated camera-focused smartphones.
Performance
The vivo S16’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset is built on a larger node than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). While the 870 offers a higher peak clock speed (3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the 6nm process of the Dimensity 7030 generally leads to better power efficiency. The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) is geared towards sustained performance, making it ideal for gamers. The Dimensity 7030’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) architecture prioritizes efficiency, potentially resulting in smoother everyday performance and less heat generation. The S16 will likely outperform the Edge 40 Neo in CPU-intensive tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo will likely offer better sustained performance under load due to its more efficient chipset.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h. This suggests excellent power management and optimization. The vivo S16’s battery capacity is unknown, but its more power-hungry Snapdragon 870 likely necessitates a larger battery to achieve comparable endurance. Both phones support fast charging, with the Motorola Edge 40 Neo reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes with its 68W wired charging, and the vivo S16 achieving 50% in 19 minutes with its 66W wired charging. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging time, combined with its superior battery life, gives it a clear advantage in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S16 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications without throttling, and if you prioritize raw processing power over extended battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone with excellent battery endurance, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.