vivo S16 Pro vs. ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Red Magic 6s Pro is the clear winner for gamers and power users, boasting a superior chipset, blazing-fast charging, and exceptional battery life. The vivo S16 Pro shines with its sleek design, potentially better camera capabilities (though details are limited), and a more balanced overall experience for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2021, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | Pressure sensitive zones (450Hz touch-sensing) Sliding trigger on the back Built-in cooling fan RGB Light | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 165Hz, 700 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 11, Redmagic 4.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 17 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 65 min (International) |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh, non-removable - International modelLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable - China model |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White |
| Models | V2245A | - |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -21.4 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 758329 (v8), 870708 (v9) GeekBench: 14612 (v4.4), 3664 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S16 Pro
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially excellent selfie camera
- Fast 66W charging
- Balanced smartphone experience
- Less powerful chipset than Red Magic
- Battery life likely shorter
- Camera details currently limited
- May lack gaming-specific features
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro
- Exceptional performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Outstanding battery life
- Gaming-focused features (cooling system, shoulder triggers)
- Less emphasis on camera quality
- Design may be less appealing to some
- International charging speed slower (66W)
- Larger and heavier than the S16 Pro
Display Comparison
The Red Magic 6s Pro boasts a 'nominal infinite' contrast ratio display, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors, likely with a high refresh rate optimized for gaming. The vivo S16 Pro's display is expected to be good, but details on refresh rate and contrast are currently unavailable. The Red Magic's display is likely the superior choice for visual immersion.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the vivo S16 Pro are currently limited, but it's expected to focus on selfie capabilities and portrait photography. The Red Magic 6s Pro's camera is generally considered decent but not its primary strength, prioritizing performance over photography. A full camera comparison will require more detailed testing of the S16 Pro.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888+ in the Red Magic 6s Pro offers a significant performance advantage over the Dimensity 8200. While the Dimensity 8200 is a capable chip, the 888+ is designed for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Expect smoother gameplay and faster app loading times on the Red Magic.
Battery Life
The Red Magic 6s Pro dominates in battery life and charging. Its 120W wired charging is incredibly fast (17 minutes to 100% in China), and its endurance rating of 97 hours is exceptional. The vivo S16 Pro's 66W charging is still fast, but significantly slower, and its battery life is likely to be less impressive.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S16 Pro? Users prioritizing aesthetics, a potentially strong camera system (details pending), and a more mainstream smartphone experience. Who should buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro? Gamers, performance enthusiasts, and those who demand the absolute fastest charging speeds and longest battery life.