vivo S16 Pro vs vivo X80 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X80 Pro is the clear winner for power users and photography enthusiasts, boasting a superior chipset, faster charging, and a more versatile camera system. The S16 Pro offers a more budget-friendly option with a sleek design and impressive selfie capabilities, ideal for social media lovers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 Pro | vivo X80 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2022, April 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 164.6 x 75.3 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 215 g / 219 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom, gimbal OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Snapdragon)/ 5.3 (Dimensity), A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 80W wired, 100% in 38 min 50W wireless, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | V2245A | V2185A, V2145 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 850 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
vivo S16 Pro
- Excellent selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Faster charging than previous S series
- More affordable
- Less powerful chipset
- Camera versatility limited
- No wireless charging
- Lower display brightness
vivo X80 Pro
- Top-tier performance
- Exceptional camera system
- Long battery life
- Fast wired and wireless charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Higher price
- Larger and heavier design
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can have thermal throttling issues (depending on variant)
Display Comparison
The vivo X80 Pro takes the display crown with its measured 1014 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The S16 Pro's display is still good, but lacks the X80 Pro's sheer brilliance and contrast. Both feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer impressive camera systems, the X80 Pro's is more advanced. It typically features a larger sensor, more versatile lens options (including a periscope telephoto), and superior image processing capabilities. The S16 Pro excels in selfie photography with its high-resolution front-facing camera, but falls short in overall camera versatility.
Performance
The vivo X80 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Dimensity 9000, depending on the variant) provides significantly more processing power than the S16 Pro's Dimensity 8200. Expect smoother multitasking, faster gaming, and quicker app loading times on the X80 Pro. The S16 Pro is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 79 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. It also supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, significantly faster than the S16 Pro's 66W wired charging. The S16 Pro's battery life is respectable, but not as impressive as the X80 Pro's.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S16 Pro? Users prioritizing a stylish design, excellent front-facing camera for selfies and video calls, and a more affordable price point. Who should buy the vivo X80 Pro? Users demanding top-tier performance, a premium camera experience, faster charging, and a larger, brighter display.