vivo S16 Pro vs vivo V27: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S16 Pro edges out the V27 thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks. While the V27 boasts impressive display brightness and endurance, the S16 Pro's processing power makes it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 Pro | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | V2245A | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S16 Pro
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 8200)
- Potentially better camera processing
- Sleek Design
- Fast Charging (66W)
- Potentially less battery life than V27
- Display not as bright as V27
vivo V27
- Exceptional Battery Life (134h endurance)
- Very Bright Display (1055 nits)
- Stylish Design
- Fast Charging (66W)
- Lower Performance (Dimensity 7200)
- Potentially less impressive camera processing
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits, significantly brighter than the S16 Pro. While the S16 Pro's display is excellent, the V27's brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. The V27 also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value and difficult to quantify.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the S16 Pro is expected to have a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. Both offer excellent photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing. The S16 Pro is rumored to have a periscope telephoto lens, offering superior zoom capabilities.
Performance
The S16 Pro's Dimensity 8200 chipset is the clear performance leader. Its Cortex-A78 cores offer a substantial speed advantage over the V27's Dimensity 7200, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The V27 is still capable, but the S16 Pro provides a more premium experience.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 134 hours. Both phones share the same 66W charging speed, achieving 50% charge in 19 minutes, but the V27's larger battery capacity gives it a significant advantage in longevity.
Buying Guide
The vivo S16 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, especially gamers and those who frequently use resource-intensive apps. The vivo V27 is a great choice for those who value exceptional battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and a stylish design, without needing top-tier processing power.