vivo S16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S16 Pro boasts a significantly faster chipset and incredibly fast charging, making it ideal for performance-focused users. The Galaxy A54 shines with its exceptional battery life, vibrant display, and Samsung's reliable software support, appealing to those prioritizing longevity and a polished user experience. It's a close call, but the S16 Pro edges ahead for raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2245A | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 400 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S16 Pro
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 8200)
- 66W Fast Charging
- Potentially Excellent Selfie Camera
- Sleek Design
- Battery Life Not as Good as A54
- Software Support May Not Be as Long-Term as Samsung
- Camera Consistency Needs Further Testing
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Reliable Samsung Software
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP67)
- Slower Processor than S16 Pro
- 25W Charging is Slow
- Design Can Be Considered Bland
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with its impressive 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering a vibrant and easily viewable screen even in direct sunlight. The vivo S16 Pro's display is good, but doesn't reach the same level of brightness or contrast. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The Galaxy A54 is known for its consistent and reliable image processing, producing pleasing photos in various conditions. The vivo S16 Pro likely focuses on selfie capabilities, potentially offering enhanced features and processing for front-facing shots. Detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing, but initial impressions suggest the A54 offers more consistent overall performance.
Performance
The vivo S16 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the S16 Pro. The A54 is still capable, but the S16 Pro is in a different league.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 119 hours is exceptional, providing multiple days of use on a single charge. The vivo S16 Pro, while offering 66W fast charging, doesn't match the A54's overall battery capacity and efficiency.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S16 Pro? Gamers, content creators, and anyone who values speed and quick charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Users prioritizing long battery life, a bright and beautiful display, and the stability of Samsung's software ecosystem.