The vivo S16 Pro and Oppo Reno9 Pro+ are both contenders in the premium mid-range smartphone market, boasting impressive cameras and sleek designs. But which one truly delivers the best overall experience? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ takes the crown thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, faster charging, and generally more premium feel. However, the vivo S16 Pro offers a compelling alternative with a strong camera and competitive price, making it a great value option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 22 | 2022, November 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 161.5 x 73.6 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, (unconfirmed stereo speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, eSE, HCE, UICC, NFC-SIM |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 1-10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised)
Reverse wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint | Black, Gold, Mint |
| Models | V2245A | PGW110 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 740 EUR |
vivo S16 Pro
- Excellent front-facing camera
- Stylish design
- Competitive price
- Good overall performance
- Less powerful chipset than Reno9 Pro+
- Slower charging
- May lack some premium features
Oppo Reno9 Pro+
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Faster 80W charging
- Premium build quality
- Versatile camera system
- Higher price
- Design might be less distinctive
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Oppo's ColorOS)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The Reno9 Pro+ likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Oppo's display technology, but both offer excellent viewing experiences. Expect vibrant colors and smooth scrolling on both.
Camera Comparison
The vivo S16 Pro is heavily marketed for its front-facing camera, likely featuring a high-resolution sensor and advanced beauty modes. The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ boasts a versatile rear camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved low-light performance. Both phones are expected to deliver excellent image quality, but cater to different priorities.
Performance
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is significantly more powerful than the vivo S16 Pro's Dimensity 8200. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Reno9 Pro+ handles demanding tasks with ease, while the S16 Pro might show slight slowdowns under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ has a clear advantage with its 80W charging, significantly faster than the vivo S16 Pro's 66W. While both offer all-day battery life with moderate usage, the Reno9 Pro+'s faster charging ensures quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S16 Pro? Users prioritizing camera quality, especially for selfies, and those seeking a stylish phone at a slightly more accessible price point. Who should buy the Oppo Reno9 Pro+? Power users, gamers, and anyone who values top-tier performance, faster charging, and a more premium build quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro+ is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset.
❓ Does the vivo S16 Pro have 5G?
Yes, both the vivo S16 Pro and Oppo Reno9 Pro+ support 5G connectivity.
❓ What operating system do these phones use?
Both phones run on Android, with customized user interfaces: Funtouch OS (vivo) and ColorOS (Oppo).
