Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The vivo S15e and Samsung Galaxy A32 are both popular mid-range options, but they cater to different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S15e takes the lead with its significantly faster Exynos 1080 chipset and blazing-fast 66W charging. However, the Galaxy A32 boasts exceptional battery life and a brighter display. Ultimately, the S15e offers better performance, while the A32 excels in longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2021, February 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min | 15W wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver/Pink | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | V2190A | SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 124.99 / £ 89.38 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S15e
- Superior Performance (Exynos 1080)
- Blazing-Fast 66W Charging
- Modern Chipset
- Likely better low-light camera performance
- Lower Battery Life than A32
- Display not as bright as A32
Samsung Galaxy A32
- Exceptional Battery Life (119h endurance)
- Bright Display (814 nits)
- Samsung Ecosystem
- Reliable Camera
- Slower Performance (Helio G80)
- Slow 15W Charging
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A32's display shines with a measured peak brightness of 814 nits, making it easier to see in direct sunlight. While the S15e's display is good, it doesn't reach the same brightness levels. The A32's contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks, though this is a marketing term. Both phones likely offer similar resolution and color accuracy, but the A32 has a clear advantage in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the S15e likely has an edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its more modern chipset. The Galaxy A32's camera is generally reliable and produces decent photos in good lighting conditions. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but the S15e's processing advantage is likely to be noticeable.
Performance
Here's where the vivo S15e truly shines. The Exynos 1080 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Helio G80 in the Galaxy A32. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the S15e. The S15e's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency despite the higher performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is the clear winner in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119 hours is exceptional. The vivo S15e, while efficient thanks to its 5nm chipset, doesn't match the A32's longevity. However, the S15e's 66W charging more than compensates, allowing it to charge from 0 to 50% in just 18 minutes.
Buying Guide
The vivo S15e is ideal for users who prioritize performance, smooth multitasking, and quick charging. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo S15e is significantly better for gaming due to its much more powerful Exynos 1080 chipset.
❓ How long will the Samsung Galaxy A32's battery last?
The Galaxy A32 is known for its excellent battery life, often lasting well over a day with moderate usage, thanks to its endurance rating of 119 hours.
