The vivo S15e and Oppo Reno8 T 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware – specifically, their chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences, alongside charging capabilities and overall value, to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and potentially more sustained performance, the vivo S15e, with its Exynos 1080, is the better choice. However, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s Snapdragon 695 offers a more efficient architecture and faster charging, making it ideal for everyday tasks and users who value battery life and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver/Pink | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | V2190A | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 340 EUR |
vivo S15e
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Exynos 1080 offers higher peak performance
- Potentially better gaming experience
- Exynos 1080 may generate more heat
- Slower full charge time compared to Oppo
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695
- Faster full charge time (44 minutes)
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Less powerful CPU compared to Exynos 1080
- May struggle with graphically intensive games
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels with FHD+ resolution. The Reno series historically emphasizes display quality, suggesting a potentially brighter and more color-accurate panel. The absence of LTPO technology on either device implies standard refresh rate implementations, likely 60Hz or 90Hz. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend on sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is notable; its presence would significantly improve low-light photography and video stabilization. It’s reasonable to assume both phones include a primary wide-angle lens, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, though the usefulness of 2MP macro lenses is often questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S15e’s Exynos 1080 (5nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. While the Exynos 1080 has a clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from a more modern 6nm process, potentially leading to better power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation under sustained load, potentially mitigating throttling. The Exynos 1080 will likely excel in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming, while the Snapdragon 695 will provide a smoother experience for everyday use.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s 67W charging with full charge in 44 minutes offers a significant advantage over the vivo S15e’s 66W charging (50% in 18 minutes). While both are fast, the Reno8 T’s complete charge time is considerably quicker. The Reno8 T also includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the S15e, allowing it to charge other devices. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the Snapdragon 695’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size compared to the S15e.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15e if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and appreciate a chipset known for its processing prowess. Buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G if you prioritize battery efficiency, quick charging, and a smooth experience for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. The Reno8 T’s reverse wired charging is also a unique benefit for accessory users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1080 in the vivo S15e overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1080 is known to generate more heat than some competing chipsets. While it offers strong performance, extended gaming at high settings could lead to thermal throttling, reducing sustained performance. The effectiveness of the phone's cooling system will be a key factor in mitigating this.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo Reno8 T 5G compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers I already own?
Yes, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G supports Power Delivery (PD) charging. This means you can utilize existing PD chargers to charge the device, although the charging speed may vary depending on the charger's wattage. Using a compatible PD charger will likely still be faster than standard charging.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695 handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can run PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming-focused chipset like the Snapdragon 8 series, so don't expect maximum settings at high frame rates. Expect playable performance at medium settings.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Oppo Reno8 T 5G useful for charging accessories like earbuds or smartwatches?
Absolutely. The reverse wired charging feature allows you to use the Reno8 T 5G as a power bank for smaller devices like wireless earbuds, smartwatches, or even another smartphone. While the charging speed won't be as fast as a dedicated charger, it's a convenient feature for emergencies or when you're on the go.
