vivo S15e vs. OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a slight performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 80W charging and a comparable 100-hour endurance rating. While the S15e is a capable device, the Nord 2T’s charging speed and overall efficiency provide a more compelling user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S15e | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.7 x 73.6 x 8.5 mm (6.29 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver/Pink | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2190A | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S15e
- Sleek and stylish design (assumed based on vivo’s brand image)
- Capable Exynos 1080 processor for everyday tasks
- 66W fast charging provides decent top-up speeds
- Slower charging compared to the Nord 2T
- Performance slightly behind the Dimensity 1300
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster Dimensity 1300 chipset for improved performance
- Ultra-fast 80W charging with PD support
- Comparable 100-hour battery endurance
- Design may be less visually striking than the S15e (subjective)
- Image processing style may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the vivo S15e (brightness data unavailable). Both phones feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term for OLED panels. Without detailed color accuracy data for the S15e, it’s difficult to assess which offers superior color reproduction. However, the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture, a direct comparison is challenging. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both phones suggests limited utility, as these sensors typically lack the detail and dynamic range for truly compelling macro photography. Image processing styles will likely differ, with vivo often favoring vibrant, saturated colors and OnePlus aiming for a more natural look. Further testing is needed to determine which phone delivers superior image quality in various conditions.
Performance
The OnePlus Nord 2T’s MediaTek Dimensity 1300, fabricated on a 6nm process, holds a slight architectural advantage over the vivo S15e’s 5nm Exynos 1080. Both CPUs share a core configuration of 1x Cortex-A78 prime core, 3x Cortex-A78 performance cores, and 4x Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the Dimensity 1300’s higher clock speed (3.0 GHz vs 2.8 GHz) on the prime core translates to a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm node of the Dimensity 1300 also contributes to potentially better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained gaming. While both phones are capable, the Nord 2T has a slight edge.
Battery Life
Both the vivo S15e and OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord 2T’s 80W wired charging, with support for PD (Power Delivery), can replenish the battery from 0-50% in a significantly shorter time than the S15e’s 66W charging (50% in 18 minutes). This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The comparable endurance ratings suggest that the Nord 2T’s more powerful charging doesn’t come at the expense of battery longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15e if you prioritize a sleek design and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for social media, browsing, and light gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 80W charging. This phone is ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick battery boost.