vivo S15 vs Oppo Find X5 Lite: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the vivo S15 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a noticeable advantage over the Dimensity 900, despite the Oppo Find X5 Lite’s competitive charging speed and comparable battery endurance. The S15 is the better choice for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S15 | Oppo Find X5 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 19 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 27 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 18 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Yellow | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | V2203A | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S15
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 870
- Faster partial charging (50% in 18 mins)
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- Battery capacity unknown
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Competitive 65W fast charging with PD
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Long battery endurance (123h rating)
- Dimensity 900 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 870
- Potentially less smooth gaming experience
Display Comparison
Both the vivo S15 and Oppo Find X5 Lite boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and panel type (AMOLED vs LCD) are missing. Given Oppo’s history with vibrant AMOLED displays, it’s likely the Find X5 Lite benefits from superior color reproduction. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Find X5 Lite likely offers a more visually striking experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking for both devices. However, the absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone prioritizes high-end photography. The Oppo Find X5 Lite likely relies on software processing to enhance image quality, while the vivo S15’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and image signal processor (ISP). Without more data, it’s impossible to determine a clear winner in this category.
Performance
The vivo S15’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) significantly outperforms the Oppo Find X5 Lite’s MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm) in CPU and GPU benchmarks. The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a substantial boost in single-core performance compared to the Dimensity 900’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870, while older than the Dimensity 900’s 6nm, is well-optimized, offering a strong balance of performance and efficiency. Users who frequently engage in resource-intensive tasks will find the S15’s performance advantage compelling.
Battery Life
Both phones offer comparable battery endurance, with an official rating of 123 hours for the Oppo Find X5 Lite. The vivo S15’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 66W wired charging (50% in 18 minutes) is slightly faster than the Find X5 Lite’s 65W wired charging (100% in 31 minutes). The Find X5 Lite also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the S15. While the charging speeds are close, the S15’s faster partial charge could be beneficial for quick top-ups. The similar endurance ratings suggest both phones can comfortably last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease, and value a smoother, more responsive user experience. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Lite if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on fast charging and all-day battery life, and are less concerned with pushing the phone to its absolute performance limits.