vivo S15 Pro vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Detailed Performance and Feature Breakdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and value, the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 9000+ chipset delivers noticeably superior performance, offsetting the slightly slower charging speed. However, the vivo S15 Pro remains a strong contender for those prioritizing charging speed and a potentially more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S15 Pro | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 19 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 27 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 18 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Gray, Blue |
| Models | V2207A | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 570 EUR |
vivo S15 Pro
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- Sleek and modern design (assumed)
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 8100 chip
- Less powerful processor than the Xiaomi 12 Pro
- May lack some flagship features found in the 12 Pro
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 9000+ chipset
- Likely superior camera hardware and image processing
- Flagship-level performance for demanding tasks
- Slower 67W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Xiaomi 12 Pro, being a flagship, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more sophisticated color calibration. The S15 Pro, while still excellent, may prioritize power efficiency in its display tuning. Without specific display specs, it's reasonable to assume the 12 Pro offers a slightly more visually impressive experience, particularly in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi’s flagship history suggests a greater emphasis on camera hardware and computational photography. The 12 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image stabilization (OIS) than the S15 Pro. While the S15 Pro likely delivers excellent image quality, the 12 Pro’s superior processing power allows for more complex image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. We can assume both phones will have capable main sensors, but the Xiaomi likely has an edge in overall image quality.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) holds a significant advantage in raw processing power thanks to its Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) chipset. This chip features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, compared to the S15 Pro’s Dimensity 8100 (5nm) with its Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.85 GHz. The 9000+’s more advanced architecture and smaller 4nm process node translate to better sustained performance and thermal efficiency. The 12 Pro also benefits from a more modern CPU core arrangement (1+3+4) versus the S15 Pro’s (4+4), further enhancing multi-tasking capabilities. The S15 Pro is still a capable performer, but the 12 Pro is demonstrably faster.
Battery Life
The vivo S15 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 18 minutes. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, is comparatively slower. However, the 12 Pro’s more efficient Dimensity 9000+ chipset may offset this difference in real-world usage. Without knowing the battery capacities of each device, it’s hard to say which offers better overall battery life. The S15 Pro prioritizes *speed* of charging, while the 12 Pro aims for a balance of speed and efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15 Pro if you need exceptionally fast 80W charging and prioritize a sleek design with a focus on everyday usability. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a more powerful processor for gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing, and are willing to trade a bit of charging speed for that extra performance.