The vivo S15 Pro and iQOO Neo 6 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The S15 Pro focuses on a sleek design and the latest MediaTek silicon, while the iQOO Neo 6 prioritizes gaming performance and sustained battery life with a proven Qualcomm chipset. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the vivo S15 Pro is the better choice. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset, built on a more efficient 5nm process, offers a performance edge over the iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870, despite the latter’s excellent endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 19 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 27 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 18 min | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | V2207A | I2126 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S15 Pro
- More efficient 5nm Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Potentially faster overall performance
- Likely improved thermal management
- Battery capacity unknown
- Display specifications limited
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Excellent 97-hour endurance rating
- Fast initial charging speed (50% in 12 min)
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Less efficient 7nm Snapdragon 870
- Potentially more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones lack detailed display specifications beyond the iQOO Neo 6’s measured 772 nits peak brightness. However, given vivo’s typical implementation, we can expect the S15 Pro to offer a vibrant AMOLED panel. The iQOO Neo 6’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a standard AMOLED experience. The absence of refresh rate information for the S15 Pro is a notable omission; the Neo 6 likely has a 120Hz panel, a common feature in this segment. The S15 Pro’s display quality will likely be geared towards color accuracy for media consumption, while the Neo 6’s is optimized for visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, vivo generally prioritizes camera performance in its S-series, suggesting the S15 Pro may have a more advanced camera system. The iQOO Neo 6, being gaming-focused, may prioritize video recording stability. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is a significant gap in the provided data. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and night mode, but image quality will heavily depend on the underlying sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S15 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) boasts a newer architecture and a more efficient manufacturing process compared to the iQOO Neo 6’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The Dimensity 8100’s octa-core configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) promises faster processing speeds, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. The Snapdragon 870 (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) remains a strong performer, but the 5nm process of the Dimensity 8100 translates to better thermal efficiency and potentially less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both likely feature LPDDR5 RAM, the S15 Pro’s chipset will benefit more from faster memory speeds.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization. While the S15 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 5nm chipset should contribute to improved power efficiency. Both phones support 80W wired charging, but the charging speeds differ: the S15 Pro reaches 70% in 18 minutes, while the Neo 6 hits 50% in 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes. This suggests the Neo 6’s charging curve is more aggressive initially, but the S15 Pro may maintain a faster charging rate beyond the 50% mark.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15 Pro if you need a phone with a more modern chipset for demanding applications and appreciate a potentially smoother user experience. Buy the iQOO Neo 6 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and consistent gaming performance, and are comfortable with a slightly older, but still capable, processor. The Neo 6 is also a strong contender for users who value a proven track record of thermal stability under load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8100 in the S15 Pro get noticeably warmer than the Snapdragon 870 during prolonged gaming?
While the Snapdragon 870 is known for its thermal efficiency, the Dimensity 8100’s 5nm process should result in comparable or even better thermal performance. The more efficient manufacturing process allows the S15 Pro to maintain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling, potentially leading to a cooler experience during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the S15 Pro compare to the iQOO Neo 6 in real-world usage?
The iQOO Neo 6 charges faster initially, reaching 50% in just 12 minutes. However, the S15 Pro reaches 70% in 18 minutes, suggesting a more consistent charging rate beyond the initial burst. While the Neo 6 hits 100% in 32 minutes, the S15 Pro’s charging curve may be more efficient in the later stages, potentially minimizing heat buildup during the final charging percentage.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it is. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of OIS, it's difficult to assess the camera capabilities accurately. However, vivo generally invests heavily in camera technology for its S-series, suggesting the S15 Pro may have an edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
