vivo S15 Pro vs Realme GT Neo 3T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the vivo S15 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset, built on a more efficient 5nm process, offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 870, despite the latter’s slightly higher clock speed. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T remains a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S15 Pro | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 19 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 27 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 70% in 18 min | 80W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | V2207A | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S15 Pro
- More efficient 5nm Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Faster charging speed (70% in 18 mins)
- Display specifications largely unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Measured 803 nits peak brightness
- Competitive price point
- Older 7nm process node
- Potentially more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the vivo S15 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar or slightly better brightness given its positioning. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term that doesn’t provide concrete information. Without knowing the panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD) or refresh rate of the S15 Pro, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the GT Neo 3T’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s likely both phones feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S15 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the Realme GT Neo 3T’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 5nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better thermal performance, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 prime core clocks higher at 3.2 GHz compared to the Dimensity 8100’s 2.85 GHz Cortex-A78, the architectural improvements and node advantage of the Dimensity chip generally result in superior overall performance. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specification for either phone makes a direct RAM speed comparison impossible, but both are likely to utilize fast RAM configurations.
Battery Life
Both the vivo S15 Pro and Realme GT Neo 3T support 80W wired charging, with the S15 Pro claiming a 70% charge in 18 minutes. Both phones share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). The fast charging speeds are the key takeaway here, allowing for quick top-ups and minimizing downtime. The efficiency of the Dimensity 8100 in the S15 Pro *could* translate to slightly better battery life under heavy load, but the identical endurance rating suggests a similar overall experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S15 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, multitasking, and future software updates with ease. Its superior chipset and potentially better thermal management make it ideal for power users. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prioritize value and a proven, reliable chipset for gaming and everyday tasks, and are comfortable with a slightly older processor generation.