vivo S12 vs Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G takes the crown with its faster charging, slightly more powerful chipset, and generally more premium feel. However, the vivo S12 offers a competitive price and excellent selfie camera, making it a solid choice for budget-conscious users prioritizing front-facing photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S12 | Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | RGB notification lights around the camera island | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | V2162A | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 400 EUR |
vivo S12
- Excellent selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Competitive price
- Smooth 90Hz display
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to Reno7 Pro
- No telephoto lens on rear camera
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Faster 65W charging
- More powerful chipset
- Versatile rear camera system (including telephoto)
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Selfie camera not as impressive as vivo S12
- Reverse wired charging may not be useful for all
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The Reno7 Pro 5G likely has slightly better peak brightness and color accuracy due to Oppo's display technology, but the difference is subtle. Screen sizes are comparable, around 6.4-6.5 inches.
Camera Comparison
The vivo S12 shines in selfie photography, boasting a high-resolution front-facing camera with advanced beauty modes. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G offers a more versatile rear camera system with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and telephoto lens, providing greater flexibility for different shooting scenarios. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both.
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G's Dimensity 1200 Max chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the vivo S12's Dimensity 1100. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno7 Pro 5G. Both handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G's 65W SuperVOOC charging is a significant advantage, allowing for incredibly fast charging times (around 31 minutes for a full charge). The vivo S12's 44W charging is still respectable, but noticeably slower. Battery capacities are similar, around 4500mAh, so real-world battery life should be comparable with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The vivo S12 is ideal for users who prioritize selfie quality, a sleek design, and a more affordable price point. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G is better suited for those who demand faster charging, a more powerful processor for demanding tasks, and a slightly more premium build quality.