vivo continues to deliver stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The S12 Pro and V25 Pro are two compelling options, each targeting a slightly different audience. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro edges out the S12 Pro thanks to its faster charging, brighter display, and slightly more powerful chipset. However, the S12 Pro might appeal to users prioritizing selfie camera quality and a more compact design. Ultimately, the V25 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2163A | V2158 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- Excellent selfie camera
- Sleek and stylish design
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Good overall performance
- Slower charging speed
- Less bright display
- Dimensity 1200 chipset (slightly less powerful)
- Battery capacity unknown
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster 66W charging
- Brighter display (805 nits)
- Dimensity 1300 chipset (slightly more powerful)
- Excellent battery life (101h endurance rating)
- Versatile camera system
- Potentially larger size
- Marketing focuses less on selfie camera
- Infinite contrast ratio claim is nominal
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 805 nits peak brightness compared to the S12 Pro's unspecified brightness. While the S12 Pro's display is likely good, the V25 Pro's higher brightness provides a noticeable advantage in outdoor conditions. The V25 Pro also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent image depth, though this is a nominal claim.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the S12 Pro is heavily marketed for its selfie camera capabilities, featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor and advanced beauty modes. The V25 Pro excels in overall photography, offering a versatile camera setup with potentially better image processing and low-light performance. Detailed camera specs are missing, making a definitive comparison difficult.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Mediatek Dimensity series, but the V25 Pro features the Dimensity 1300, a step up from the S12 Pro's Dimensity 1200. This translates to slightly better overall performance, especially in demanding games and multitasking scenarios. Both phones have the same CPU configuration, but the 1300 generally offers a small performance boost.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The S12 Pro's battery capacity is unknown, but it likely offers decent battery performance. The V25 Pro's 66W charging is significantly faster than the S12 Pro's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S12 Pro? Users prioritizing a sleek design, excellent front-facing camera for selfies and video calls, and a slightly more compact form factor. Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Those seeking faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly higher endurance rating (101 hours) compared to the S12 Pro, suggesting superior battery life.
❓ Is the Dimensity 1300 chipset a big upgrade over the Dimensity 1200?
While both are capable chipsets, the Dimensity 1300 offers a slight performance boost, particularly noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming.
