vivo S12 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more efficient chipset, the vivo S12 Pro offers compelling value. While the Galaxy S22 5G boasts a brighter display and potentially faster peak performance (Snapdragon variant), its battery life and thermal management are areas of concern, especially with the Exynos version.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S12 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S22 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 146 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm (5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 167 g / 168 g (mmWave) (5.89 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~425 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.1 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Ion 3700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | V2163A | SM-S901B, SM-S901B/DS, SM-S901U, SM-S901U1, SM-S901W, SM-S901N, SM-S9010, SM-S901E, SM-S901E/DS |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 172.63 / C$ 304.00 / £ 186.11 / € 198.01 |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.15 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 745496 (v8), 881428 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 69fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- Faster 44W charging
- More efficient Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Camera specs are less detailed
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
- Brighter display (982 nits)
- Compact form factor
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potential thermal throttling (Snapdragon/Exynos)
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos variant may have lower performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 5G clearly leads in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 982 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor use. While the S12 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s unlikely to match the S22’s brightness. The S22’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel. The S22’s smaller 6.1-inch size also contributes to a higher pixel density, resulting in a sharper image, a key benefit for media consumption. The S12 Pro likely prioritizes size over peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details are limited. The Galaxy S22 5G’s camera is described as ‘Photo / Video’ without specifics, but Samsung’s image processing is known for vibrant colors and strong detail. The S12 Pro’s camera specs are also vague. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the S12 Pro is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world benefit. The S22’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is crucial for stable video recording and low-light photography, a feature likely present on the S12 Pro as well, but its effectiveness remains unknown.
Performance
The chipset is where the core difference lies. The Samsung Galaxy S22 5G utilizes either the Exynos 2200 (Europe) or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (ROW), both built on a 4nm process. This offers a theoretical performance advantage over the vivo S12 Pro’s 6nm Dimensity 1200. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known for thermal throttling under sustained load. The Dimensity 1200, while not as powerful on paper, is generally more efficient and maintains performance for longer periods. The S22’s CPU configuration, with the Cortex-X2 prime core, aims for peak performance, while the S12 Pro’s utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, prioritizing efficiency. The S22’s LPDDR5 RAM is standard for flagships, but the S12 Pro’s RAM speed is unspecified.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S22 5G has an endurance rating of 85 hours, indicating reasonable battery life, but not exceptional. Its 25W wired charging is slower than the vivo S12 Pro’s 44W charging, meaning the S12 Pro will reach 100% faster. The S22 also supports 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the S12 Pro. While the S22’s battery capacity is unspecified, the lower charging wattage suggests a smaller battery. The S12 Pro’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S12 Pro if you need a phone with reliable all-day battery life, fast 44W charging, and a smooth user experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 5G if you prefer a more compact design, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and the risk of thermal throttling, particularly if you receive the Exynos variant.