vivo S12 Pro vs Oppo Reno7 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G edges out the vivo S12 Pro thanks to its faster charging, slightly more powerful chipset, and potentially better camera capabilities. However, the S12 Pro might appeal to those prioritizing a more refined selfie camera and a potentially more streamlined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S12 Pro | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | V2163A | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- Excellent selfie camera
- Stylish design
- Potentially cleaner software experience
- Good battery life
- Slower charging speed
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Rear camera may not be as versatile
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster charging (65W)
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Versatile camera system
- Reverse wired charging
- Software may have more bloatware
- Design might be less distinctive
- Selfie camera may not be as impressive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, providing better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno7 5G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), both displays are expected to deliver a premium viewing experience. The S12 Pro likely has a slightly more refined color calibration.
Camera Comparison
The vivo S12 Pro is heavily marketed for its selfie camera capabilities, likely featuring a high-resolution front-facing sensor and advanced beauty modes. The Oppo Reno7 5G is expected to offer a more versatile rear camera system, potentially with a wider range of lenses and features. Both phones should capture good quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions, but the S12 Pro will likely excel in selfies.
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 5G holds a performance advantage with its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset compared to the vivo S12 Pro's Dimensity 1200. While both are capable processors, the Dimensity 900 generally offers slightly better CPU and GPU performance, making it better suited for demanding games and multitasking. The S12 Pro's chipset is still very capable for everyday use.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 5G has a significant advantage in charging speed with its 65W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 31 minutes. It also includes reverse wired charging. The vivo S12 Pro offers 44W charging, which is still respectable but slower. Both phones are reported to have excellent endurance ratings (123h), suggesting long battery life under typical usage.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S12 Pro? Users prioritizing excellent front-facing camera performance for selfies and video calls, and those who appreciate a potentially cleaner Android skin. Who should buy the Oppo Reno7 5G? Those seeking faster charging speeds, a slightly more powerful processor for gaming and demanding tasks, and a versatile camera system.