The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo S12 Pro and Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer appealing features, but cater to slightly different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo S12 Pro boasts a more powerful chipset and faster charging, making it a performance leader. However, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G shines with its exceptional battery life and impressive display brightness. Ultimately, the choice depends on whether you prioritize speed or endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 40, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2019, December. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Black, White, Starry Night, Sunrise, Classic Blue |
| Models | V2163A | PCRM00, PCRT00, CPH2009 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.82 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 308231 (v8)
GeekBench: 1815 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1200)
- Faster 44W charging
- Likely excellent selfie camera
- Modern design
- Battery life not as impressive as Reno3 Pro
- Display brightness not as high
- Potential software bloat (typical of vivo)
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life (100h endurance)
- High display brightness (819 nits)
- Reliable camera performance
- Sleek design
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 765G)
- Slower 30W charging
- Older chipset may not receive as many updates
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G takes the lead here with a measured peak brightness of 819 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo S12 Pro's display is good, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The Reno3 Pro 5G also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, but the Reno3 Pro's brightness advantage is significant.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno3 Pro 5G has a reputation for consistently good image quality. While specific camera specs are missing, the Reno3 Pro 5G likely excels in low-light photography. The S12 Pro is expected to have a strong selfie camera, a common feature in vivo's S-series. A detailed camera comparison would require extensive testing, but the Reno3 Pro 5G has a slight edge based on past reviews.
Performance
The vivo S12 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 765G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Dimensity 1200's architecture also offers improved efficiency compared to the older Snapdragon chip. Expect a more responsive and fluid experience on the S12 Pro.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G is the clear winner in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 100 hours. This is significantly better than what most smartphones offer. The vivo S12 Pro's battery life is respectable, but not exceptional. The Reno3 Pro 5G's longevity makes it ideal for heavy users who need a phone that can last through multiple days on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo S12 Pro? Users who prioritize performance, gaming, and faster charging will appreciate the Dimensity 1200 chipset. Who should buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G? Those seeking long-lasting battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and a reliable camera experience will find the Reno3 Pro 5G a compelling option.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo S12 Pro is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset.
❓ Which phone will last longer on a single charge?
The Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G offers significantly longer battery life with an endurance rating of 100 hours.
❓ Does the vivo S12 Pro have 5G?
Yes, the vivo S12 Pro supports 5G connectivity.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G still a good phone in 2024?
Yes, the Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G remains a solid option, especially for those prioritizing battery life and a bright display, despite being an older model.
