Oppo Find X5 Pro vs vivo S12 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and cutting-edge charging technology, the Oppo Find X5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Dimensity 9000) provides a significant performance edge, complemented by 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. However, the vivo S12 Pro remains a compelling option for those seeking a balanced experience without the top-tier price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S12 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | V2163A | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1/Dimensity 9000)
- Likely superior camera system with advanced features
- Higher price point
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- More affordable price
- Stylish design
- Good overall performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the X5 Pro
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display even in bright sunlight. While the vivo S12 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, Oppo’s panel likely benefits from a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better battery efficiency. The Find X5 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates excellent black levels, enhancing the viewing experience for videos and games. Without specific details on the S12 Pro’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the X5 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the vivo S12 Pro. The Oppo Find X5 Pro likely features a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is almost certain on the X5 Pro, crucial for capturing sharp images and stable videos, especially in low-light conditions. While both phones likely offer a variety of shooting modes, the X5 Pro’s superior processing power allows for more complex computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X5 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) globally, and the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) in China, while the vivo S12 Pro is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, coupled with Cortex-A710 cores, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 also provides superior thermal efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1200’s 6nm node, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Dimensity 9000 variant in China offers a closer performance match to the Snapdragon, but still benefits from the 4nm process. The Find X5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro significantly outpaces the vivo S12 Pro in charging speed. With 80W wired charging, the X5 Pro can reach 50% charge in just 12 minutes, and a full charge in under an hour. The addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging further enhances its versatility. The vivo S12 Pro’s 44W wired charging is respectable, but considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the charging speed advantage of the X5 Pro is a major differentiator for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S12 Pro if you need a stylish, capable smartphone with a good camera and fast 44W charging, and prioritize value for money. It's ideal for everyday users and social media enthusiasts. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance for gaming and demanding applications, require the fastest charging speeds available (80W wired, 50W wireless), and are willing to pay a premium for a more refined flagship experience.