OnePlus 10 Pro vs vivo S12 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the OnePlus 10 Pro is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the vivo S12 Pro’s Dimensity 1200 and 44W charging, despite potential thermal throttling under heavy load. However, the S12 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a more efficient processor and a potentially smoother everyday experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo S12 Pro | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 22 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Yellow | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | V2163A | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo S12 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (80W/65W)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera performance
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Higher price point
OnePlus 10 Pro
- More efficient processor (Dimensity 1200)
- Potentially better battery life consistency
- Likely more affordable price
- Streamlined user experience (typical of vivo)
- Slower charging (44W)
- Less powerful processor
- Lacks wireless charging
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, providing excellent visibility in outdoor conditions. While the vivo S12 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls slightly behind in peak brightness given the overall positioning of the device. Both displays likely feature high contrast ratios, with the OnePlus 10 Pro explicitly stating an 'Infinite' (nominal) ratio. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s larger display size and potentially higher refresh rate (based on OnePlus’s typical implementation) contribute to a more immersive viewing experience, though the S12 Pro may offer a more color-accurate panel based on vivo’s display tuning.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the vivo S12 Pro. The OnePlus 10 Pro likely features a larger main sensor, benefiting from better light gathering and dynamic range. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) provides advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely offer capable camera systems, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s hardware and software advantages suggest a more versatile and higher-performing camera experience. We can assume the S12 Pro will focus on selfie quality, a traditional strength of the vivo brand.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) utilizes a 1x Cortex-X2 prime core, offering a performance advantage over the vivo S12 Pro’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm) which features a 1x Cortex-A78 prime core. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s newer architecture (Cortex-A710 vs A78) and smaller fabrication node (4nm vs 6nm) translate to higher peak performance and improved power efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The Dimensity 1200, while less powerful, offers a more consistent performance profile. The OnePlus 10 Pro benefits from faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x) compared to the S12 Pro (likely LPDDR4x or LPDDR5), further enhancing its multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. However, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s 80W wired charging (International) and 65W (North America) drastically reduces charging times – a full charge in 32 minutes (International) or a 58% charge in 15 minutes (North America). The vivo S12 Pro’s 44W charging is significantly slower. Furthermore, the OnePlus 10 Pro offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the S12 Pro. This makes the OnePlus 10 Pro the clear winner for users who prioritize convenience and rapid replenishment of battery power.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo S12 Pro if you need a phone that prioritizes efficient power usage for all-day battery life and a less aggressive thermal profile, making it ideal for casual users and media consumers. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you prefer uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, coupled with the convenience of incredibly fast charging, and are willing to accept potential thermal limitations during extended intensive tasks.